pouët.net

Impulse Tracker source code release

category: general [glöplog]
My response is that the WTFPL is not a good license.
added on the 2014-10-22 21:19:29 by trc_wm trc_wm
trc: you can also re-license it claiming that whoever reads it has to commit suicide, it wouldn't make it accountable by law. you can only re-license something that is accepted legally or that re-licensing is void. in this case wtf you want needs to be within the law. and it's not legal to claim sole copyright of something when there is proof of precendence.
added on the 2014-10-22 21:52:04 by psenough psenough
Some people have some weird ideas…
Some people have some weird replies to these weird ideas.

Some people should just realize why IT > XM, it's never too late.
added on the 2014-10-23 00:47:38 by __ __
Quote:
IT > XM

+1 :D
added on the 2014-10-23 01:12:01 by Alpha C Alpha C
Quote:
you can also re-license it claiming that whoever reads it has to commit suicide

Holy shit that's genius.
added on the 2014-10-23 02:04:31 by Gargaj Gargaj
Quote:
Some people should just realize why IT > XM, it's never too late.

BB Image
Never gets old.
added on the 2014-10-23 02:16:48 by Gargaj Gargaj
FT2 interface forever.
added on the 2014-10-23 07:23:02 by visy visy
If WTFPL seems too childish or vulgar, unlicense is always a good option.
added on the 2014-10-23 09:37:50 by sol_hsa sol_hsa
While FT2 had nifty sample editor and stuff like that, ST3/IT interface was more preferable due to its more keyboard oriented style.
added on the 2014-10-23 10:14:47 by ccr ccr
FT2 + GUS forever
added on the 2014-10-23 10:56:45 by marlowe marlowe
Gargaj's opinion is better.
added on the 2014-10-23 15:59:39 by __ __
ok, I'll switch to Lotus123.
added on the 2014-10-23 16:37:06 by marlowe marlowe
IT forever.
added on the 2014-10-23 19:26:44 by _-_-__ _-_-__
BB Image
added on the 2014-10-24 12:03:47 by trc_wm trc_wm
WTFPL is of course the best licence ever :D
added on the 2014-10-24 12:58:44 by rez rez
I'm actually astonished nobody thought of creating DOGEPL
added on the 2014-10-24 13:16:08 by __ __
Code:so code wow much freedoms no restrictions as-is
Awesome to see this released!
added on the 2014-10-25 16:19:00 by Maraakate Maraakate
What do you guys think of Renoise?
:|
added on the 2014-10-27 10:42:10 by __ __
Any word on those drivers? The overview says "including sound drivers", but I can't see them in the repository.
added on the 2014-10-29 15:26:52 by absence absence
Your nick seems to describe the situation realistically.
added on the 2014-10-29 15:29:33 by trc_wm trc_wm
Quote:
What do you guys think of Renoise?

BB Image
absence: Soon. (TM) Probably the same time he sets the license.
Man, there are *so many* naughty things I want to do to this program... but I barely know a single line of ASM and have no idea where to start. Oh well.

BTW IT >> XM - but I'm talking about the *format*. I like Fastrracker itself just fine but the way XM forces samples into instrument containers and the way things like default pans are handled is beyond infuriating...

That said if I'm working in XM I'd rather use Digitrakker. But then IT ~<> MDL >> XM.

If I ever manage to code something release-worthy I am totally using the DOGEPL.
added on the 2014-10-30 09:48:37 by jmph jmph

login