pouët.net

fix me beautifull

category: general [glöplog]
sorry... should I write it again with bbcode?
added on the 2006-09-04 16:42:14 by texel texel
I hope now looks better:

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=8169
http://www.29740.com/ma/artcandy.zip

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=9095
http://www.29740.com/ma/au_Kilo.rar

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=20204
http://www.29740.com/ma/jwapg.rar

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=9798
http://www.29740.com/ma/kilomegagigaterapetaexademo.zip

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=8962
http://www.29740.com/ma/54.zip

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=12401
http://www.29740.com/ma/nofomofo.rar

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=22999
http://www.29740.com/ma/pig.zip

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=23209
http://www.29740.com/ma/pig2.zip

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=8647
http://www.29740.com/ma/theFreak.zip

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=26109
http://www.29740.com/ma/voxel.rar

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=8841
http://www.29740.com/ma/firedemowin32.zip
added on the 2006-09-04 16:43:53 by texel texel
It's just that we use the usual pouet interface with additional links/fields to change download links, screenshots, nfos, etc, so yes, it helps a lot when you do it 20 times a day or more.

Anyway, it's done ;)
added on the 2006-09-04 16:50:02 by keops keops
Thanks so much keops :)
added on the 2006-09-04 16:56:54 by texel texel
nanook: fakeuser thing is to avoid double votes and such.. i would need to merge you with texel and 30002 to change your level on this one.. O_o
added on the 2006-09-04 18:56:58 by psenough psenough
ps, forget it if it is too many effort. May I create a new user? I might use texel account, but I don't remember the password...
added on the 2006-09-04 19:14:44 by texel texel
In the "we like" section :
Demovibe button's url to be changed to :
http://www.demovibes.org

Thanks !
added on the 2006-09-04 22:46:38 by willbe willbe
Gonna entertain you for a couple of seconds:

Moving all amiga productions requiring a 68020+ and more than 512kb of chip memory while being labelled as ECS into the AGA category would be wise i think, it's not because they don't use the extra aga features / colors that they run on the real machines.

For example, it's unfair that this being referenced in the same category as this

As they don't require the same hardware (the later one even requiring a configuration that never existed afaik: ECS + 2mb chipram + 68020 is pure fantasy).

Those who wanna do it on oldschool amiga platforms should adapt to the rules that were in application when the shit was still hot and not bend them to their advantage because they can do jack shit with a simple 68000.
(the common rule, at least until 1994 was: a 68000 + 512kb chip + 512kb fake fast + an ECS chipset, the machine most commonly owned by amiga demosceners).

Or create a "UAE" category ;)
added on the 2006-09-05 06:49:39 by hitchhikr hitchhikr
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=26134
proper link
https://cpu.untergrund.net/releases/!cpu_ducks_you.zip
added on the 2006-09-05 09:58:15 by bhead bhead
bhead: done.
added on the 2006-09-05 12:25:56 by bhead bhead
added on the 2006-09-05 12:27:14 by bhead bhead
...
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=26230
platform should be c64, type should be demo
sorry (i'm sure i entered them right but something happened!)
added on the 2006-09-05 15:47:46 by Sverker Sverker
done
added on the 2006-09-05 15:52:37 by keops keops
ltk_tscc: yes....
added on the 2006-09-05 17:02:42 by iq iq
added on the 2006-09-05 21:11:07 by hitchhikr hitchhikr
changed. the uae request for ps remains open.
added on the 2006-09-05 22:17:09 by hitchhikr hitchhikr
@hitchhikr
What about "enter the dotmatrix". It was written on an Amiga 1500 with 68030 and fastmem. I don't think it *requires* fastmem, but it probably would crash without an 020. But it wasn't even written on an AGA machine.
added on the 2006-09-06 00:08:03 by xeron xeron
done
added on the 2006-09-06 05:03:40 by keops keops
Xeron: personally i've never seen an amiga 1500 (which wasn't available outside uk) but i remember the amiga 2500.

I think it'll be better to dispatch the amiga productions into 4 categories:

- Amiga 500/2000
(productions needing a 68000 + 512k of chipmem, OCS chipset)

- Amiga 500+/600
(68000 + 1mb of chipmem, ECS chipset)

- Amiga 1500/2500/3000
(68020 or more + 1mb or more chipmem, ECS chipset)

- Amiga 1200/4000
(68020 or more + AGA chipset).

A little bit like it's done for 16/32 bits atari prods which is a fair classification imho.

Also, i don't think there's many entries to change in the database, mostly post-uae ones needing funky hardware requirements.
added on the 2006-09-06 07:10:23 by hitchhikr hitchhikr
My bad, the amiga 1500 should be included in the amiga 500/2000 category as it seems it was just a 2000 repackaged.
added on the 2006-09-06 07:26:06 by hitchhikr hitchhikr
added on the 2006-09-06 09:53:31 by hitchhikr hitchhikr
teh done.
added on the 2006-09-06 11:40:51 by iks iks

login