Come Play With Us by Havocplague
screenshot added by Bobic on 2010-08-11 23:46:59
platform :
type :
release date : august 2010
release party : Assembly 2010
compo : 4k procedural gfx
ranked : 2nd
  • 9
  • 10
  • 4
popularity : 58%
  • 0.22
alltime top: #12372
added on the 2010-08-11 23:46:59 by Bobic Bobic

popularity helper

increase the popularity of this prod by spreading this URL:

or via: facebook twitter pinterest tumblr


At first I did not believe this could be procedural. Then I saw the source-code. Hi hi, freak... Anyhow, thumbs up!
rulez added on the 2010-08-12 07:59:38 by w00t! w00t!
you can easily compress pictures with such big empty areas under 4k on a c64,
sucks added on the 2010-08-12 11:22:48 by Oswald Oswald
The 'stages' file seems to show the pic being pixelled by a graphician. I guess it's not procedural at all?
added on the 2010-08-12 12:40:53 by psonice psonice
depends on your definition of "procedural" i guess :)
added on the 2010-08-12 13:46:29 by Gargaj Gargaj
So the 'procedural' part is that they save the ~1k pixels in the order they were placed by the gfx'er and plot them back at the screen? ;) Bah..
added on the 2010-08-12 14:01:41 by tomaes tomaes
Hey guys, once again: the maker of this was mad enough to enter formulas in the source code which make all together this drawing. And yes, Oswald, it can be done easier than that way :-)
But anyway, thumbs up for the enormous effort of the guy!
added on the 2010-08-12 16:40:05 by w00t! w00t!
Seriously, where do you find formulas in the code?
added on the 2010-08-12 17:17:51 by britelite britelite
Ha ha...
added on the 2010-08-12 18:52:43 by w00t! w00t!
So, where can I find the said code? Only code I can find is the usual stuff at $0801 (which is oddly enough code to display a regular bitmap)
added on the 2010-08-12 19:45:04 by britelite britelite
I was being ironic, Britelite, 'cause I think you're right; these are not formulas, these are "pitch and put"-data... No procedural graphic at all! :-)
added on the 2010-08-12 19:56:06 by w00t! w00t!
That's one problem with procedural compo. That one could enter with an oldschool platform without it being procedural in it's true self. But who can blame them? It's still code (with data) that shows an image.

But I liked the picture overall.
rulez added on the 2010-08-12 19:58:54 by Optimus Optimus
yeah, and a very great and important problem also.

nice gfx, or a picture.
rulez added on the 2010-08-13 11:49:55 by mrp- mrp-
added on the 2010-08-13 16:44:10 by Eldrik Eldrik
Who said the picture should be fully procedural? The Assembly compo rules don't specify anything like that.

A thumb for the picture.
rulez added on the 2010-08-13 17:49:34 by Blueberry Blueberry
could you please explain the idea behind this pic ? =)

thumb goes for the choice of colours.
rulez added on the 2010-08-13 18:07:48 by relias abardon relias abardon
Should be fairly easy to write a cross-platform script to convert a pic into lda #$xx / sta $yyyy. It doesn't help that it looks like converted bullcrap also. Perhaps I'm missing some inside joke here?
sucks added on the 2010-08-13 18:13:11 by El Topo El Topo
no matter how it's done the picture looks like a piece of converted crap
sucks added on the 2010-08-13 18:18:09 by hollowman hollowman
Christ, didn't even know that the pic was up here. First of all, it's NOT procedural, it is handdrawn. (Stages here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4102466/stages.png) Compo is called EXECUTABLE GRAPHICS for a reason, says nothing about it having to be procedural. Now go have a beer or something.
Ha ha ha... End of discussion!!!
added on the 2010-08-13 19:17:59 by w00t! w00t!
I like the pic, and as said the compo was "Executable graphics" not "Procedural graphics".
rulez added on the 2010-08-13 19:19:04 by evil evil
Not end of discussion. Can I see the buildup stages for the face please?
added on the 2010-08-13 20:09:32 by El Topo El Topo
(I realize that I'm participating in some lame ass joke but what the fuck, it's on the house)
added on the 2010-08-13 20:10:42 by El Topo El Topo
Thumb up for causing such a heated discussion. Pic is ok too.
rulez added on the 2010-08-13 20:16:41 by harism harism
Didn't know I had it in me to cause a hoax like this :-)
I suggets we go on and look forward to new (really) interesting releases for the good old bread box!

Hollowman, you participated here, maybe you feel like coming out with a great new product? An enormous 3D pic using several megs in Reu for example? :-)
added on the 2010-08-13 20:23:40 by w00t! w00t!
Looks converted indeed.
sucks added on the 2010-08-13 20:33:16 by Radiant Radiant
El topo: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4102466/stages.png that IS the buildup of the face, a quick sketch to determine lightsources, some cleanup and dithering. About an afternoon of work.
WsW, you participated here as well, go make one yourself.
added on the 2010-08-13 21:44:55 by hollowman hollowman
Why don't we all make one? Seems to me there's a lot of talented people here who rather spend their time on pouet than on their (unreleased) masterpieces.
I wish I could. :-)
added on the 2010-08-14 11:17:30 by w00t! w00t!
face looks nice, jellyfish not-so-nice
added on the 2010-08-14 23:22:04 by s7ing_ATZ s7ing_ATZ
what is procedural graphics anyways
added on the 2010-08-15 07:55:42 by tonyrocks tonyrocks
I expected this to happen =)
rulez added on the 2010-08-15 15:22:15 by T$ T$
hmm... No good no bad...
added on the 2011-03-07 23:33:27 by SoDa7 SoDa7
What Optimus said
rulez added on the 2012-05-26 02:12:26 by Fell Fell

submit changes

if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,

do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.

instead, click here !

[previous edits]

add a comment