pouët.net

because they are so rare, eh? hihihi

proteque: and rest of the amiga demos should be merged with atari st ;)

:P

after reading this all i think it is bestest to only have 2 categories: demos for Gravis and `others`. right?

DAMN RIGHT

ECS should be renamed to OCS as soon as ftp://de.aminet.net/pub/aminet/demo/ecs/ becomes ftp://de.aminet.net/pub/aminet/demo/ocs/ ;)

OCS rulez! it's the only real chipset!

my chipset can beat the shit out of your chipset, and my amiga can beat the shit out of your pc, and my pc can beat the shit out of your atari, which can beat the shit out of any amiga.
is the circle full now? can we just move along?

So then show me how this is gonna look correctly on ECS WITHOUT any fixing of the code! Yes, there are some productions that actually REQUIRE OCS!

And what about this one ?

I personally am not very passionate about this subject, since there are so many other issues with Pouet than just OCS being called ECS.. :) But just to back up StingRay, I personally can immediately name about 70 demos which require OCS and fail on later versions of the chipset. There are more out there too, since my own data is far from complete.

But hey, why waste time making the database more accurate when you can flame others on the BBS and paste animal porn! \o/

OCS == BASS