pouët.net

Random image thread

category: residue [glöplog]
* cof * you're ruining the thread * cof *
added on the 2007-06-09 04:50:34 by xernobyl xernobyl
ok, fine :P

BB Image

added on the 2007-06-09 05:10:44 by alienus alienus
Pas classe !
added on the 2007-06-09 10:51:22 by faraday faraday
I guess he's not getting any tonight, at least through that orifice...
added on the 2007-06-09 11:11:17 by CiH CiH
O RLY?!
BB Image
added on the 2007-06-09 21:33:09 by ewerybody ewerybody
BB Image
added on the 2007-06-09 22:59:17 by scoutski scoutski
Quote:
And when exactly was it that humans decided that they could even *comprehend* what a flawed human was? Sure a human can be flawed in the context of a society which requests certain fundamental traits from people, but in terms of nature the closest thing to a 'flawed human' is a monkey. The natural environment has governed evolution since the dawn of life, why is it that suddenly now we must take it in to our own hands? I dread the day when someone comes into power who thinks that they, even when armed with current scientific knowledge (which - I hasten to add - will in 200 years seem primitive by comparison), have the right to kill off a potential branch of organisms simply because they have misunderstood the fundamentals of evolution or confused it with identity.


It is exactly the progress of science that increases the lifespan of flawed (i.e. physically sick) individuals.
Medicine is being used indiscrimately. The process meddled with is in all other species taken care of by nature itself.

So my point was not that it must be taken in our own hands. More we need to let go of it which is already too much in our hands.

A monkey is a monkey. Not a flawed human. Evolution evidently has many branches.

Change is the nature of science because of its very nature. Not 200 years, but one big breakthrough tomorrow might invalidate all we know today.

BB Image
added on the 2007-06-10 01:52:04 by Joop Joop
BB Image
added on the 2007-06-10 02:05:33 by button button
Quote:
Change is the nature of science because of its very nature. Not 200 years, but one big breakthrough tomorrow might invalidate all we know today.

Well, exactly. Our understanding of the what a "flawed" human really was could radically change along with it. Not only that, if a human really IS flawed then nature would dictate that they would die out naturally due to *lack of reproduction*. Or would you just neuter any man or woman who came into contact with one of your supposed "less-than-me's"?
Quote:
It is exactly the progress of science that increases the lifespan of flawed (i.e. physically sick) individuals.

You could say that 'flawed' humans who are given longer lifespans through medicine are viable for the ultra-race simply because they have evolved a mechanism for fooling the better humans into thinking they deserve to live, or that we are too stupid to just let them die. After all, that is a tangent of the warped mindset which dictates that any human is flawed in the first place.

I think the root of your line of thinking lies in the psychological, not the physical. An inferiority/superiority complex, or something more subtle, because there is really *no need* to kill off a subset of our own species, there never has been. If your argument runs along the lines that medicine has destabilised the natural progression of our species, then what you're suggesting is just as misguided and unnatural. The point of evolution is that animals which survive *environmental* threats reproduce. Although I will admit that some species will fight each other to inseminate the queen, but that's largely irrelevant, if anything, only highlighting the primitive line of thought you're following. When it comes down to it there is as little reason to think that a certain type of human will dull the gene pool as there is to think that a witch will sink in water.
added on the 2007-06-10 02:42:27 by alienus alienus
BB Image
added on the 2007-06-10 03:17:16 by keops keops
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOBZZZZZZ.
.
;
added on the 2007-06-10 03:22:18 by bdk bdk
BB ImageBB ImageBB ImageBB ImageBB Image
BB ImageBB ImageBB ImageBB ImageBB Image
added on the 2007-06-10 03:23:52 by bdk bdk
@Broderick that was cheap. Now here is person dressed as Tux
BB Image
added on the 2007-06-10 09:04:40 by numtek numtek
BB Image
added on the 2007-06-10 09:48:10 by Crazy Q Crazy Q
BB Image
What an ugly bitch.

This is for you,Paris.
BB Image
An this is the man of your fucking life
BB Image

I hope that you die, BITCH.
added on the 2007-06-10 10:15:01 by orb orb
BB Image
added on the 2007-06-10 11:14:20 by icabod_ra icabod_ra
orb: she sure is a stupid chick that gets a lot of undeserved attention, but why do you hate her so bad? Did she turn down a date with you, or something??/
added on the 2007-06-10 11:25:11 by FiL FiL
BB Image
added on the 2007-06-10 13:44:36 by Crazy Q Crazy Q
BB Image



added on the 2007-06-10 14:19:36 by ck ck
BB Image
added on the 2007-06-10 14:27:44 by ck ck
BB Image
added on the 2007-06-10 14:46:40 by magic magic
BB Image
added on the 2007-06-10 15:28:10 by mrhill mrhill
Quote:
Did she turn down a date with you, or something??/


ROTFL.

For me,is simply the word. Socialite. Party-hopping socialite.
There are a lot of people (A LOT) who work,with no attention.

This bitch is everywhere. In TV,newspapers,etc. WHY?
She is only a cocaine addict rich bitch.
Simple.

Anyway,let's back with the images:

BB Image

OMG.
added on the 2007-06-10 17:59:22 by orb orb
Scary face thread is that way >>
added on the 2007-06-10 18:20:44 by nitro2k01 nitro2k01
BB Image
added on the 2007-06-10 20:00:39 by ck ck

login