category: general [glöplog]
BB Image
BB Image
BB Image
These logos would've been better with png alpha transparency. jsyk.
added on the 2006-10-15 19:34:19 by nitro2k01 nitro2k01
PNG transparency doesnt work correctly in all browsers (like IE) which will make the logos look fugly for some. I'm guessing thats the reason they're GIFs.
added on the 2006-10-15 20:25:08 by wb wb
Well I know that shit abou 90% of the general public using IE, but I guess/hope sceners are smarter than that. Seriously, I wouldn't give a damn about IE users.
added on the 2006-10-15 20:29:26 by nitro2k01 nitro2k01
I use IE... namely the newest version. It's better than mozilla and almost better than opera.
added on the 2006-10-15 20:55:36 by xernobyl xernobyl
Last time I checked, Pouet was openminded and provided us with demos from all platforms, using any API and trying to be browsable by most visitors.

We are not one of those zealot websites, narrowminded and accepting only what a few zealots deem good (Unix only, DirectX only or Mozilla only)

If some authors want their logo to be displayed properly on all browser using gif, then let is be.

(I also use IE by the way)
added on the 2006-10-15 21:13:13 by keops keops
keops: pouet > nitro2k01 && nitro2k01 < pouet
added on the 2006-10-15 21:17:44 by the_Ye-Ti the_Ye-Ti
the_Ye-Ti: Yes, obivously...
xernobyl: Good, then you should have no problem at all watching semi-transparent png's.
added on the 2006-10-15 21:31:00 by nitro2k01 nitro2k01
Wow, I guess you missed all those tiresome logo discussions in the past. Way to go!
added on the 2006-10-15 21:37:33 by Shifter Shifter

PNG transparency doesnt work correctly in all browsers (like IE) which will make the logos look fugly for some. I'm guessing thats the reason they're GIFs.

So instead of making them look fugly on IE only they're now fugly on every browser :-)
added on the 2006-10-15 21:44:07 by sparcus sparcus
shftr: Maybe I did. But what I've done instead is to upload png versions of people's gif logos. But unfortunately, they seem to be deleted. Fair enough in a way, but still unfair in other ways.

Btw: A good looking png logo:
BB Image
added on the 2006-10-15 22:20:08 by nitro2k01 nitro2k01
And here's one that would've looked better with png opacity:
BB Image
added on the 2006-10-15 22:20:46 by nitro2k01 nitro2k01
Good:BB Image
added on the 2006-10-15 22:28:29 by nitro2k01 nitro2k01
Ooops. My mistake (:
But still a good-looking logo.
added on the 2006-10-15 22:29:43 by nitro2k01 nitro2k01
This topis is
BB Image
added on the 2006-10-15 22:55:10 by doh doh
added on the 2006-10-16 00:04:10 by bartman bartman
nitro2k01: though I cry out loud whenever I see a nice logo wasted by obsolete/inapropriate format, I (mostly) gave up discussing that topic.

xernobyl: you're talking about ie7 or ie6 ? 7 support PNG correctly ... it's only been 10 years since the publication of the spec but hey it works now ...

Anyway last time I checked ie7 was supposed to be pushed as a windows update so all the cry baby using ie6- will soon have a "better" browser.
added on the 2006-10-16 00:51:07 by p01 p01
doh_drd: Don't even remotely compare me to adok pls!
added on the 2006-10-16 07:48:31 by nitro2k01 nitro2k01
BB Image
(This is also for my own reference if I get some time over to ocnvert a few logos)
added on the 2006-10-16 07:49:28 by nitro2k01 nitro2k01
cry baby using ie6- will soon have a "better" browser.

Unless they're not using WinXP SP2 or block the fuck out of updates. They do that a lot, you know.
added on the 2006-10-16 17:44:54 by Shifter Shifter
see this is a bad logo too:
BB Image
the original was much better. *cough*
added on the 2006-10-16 17:57:52 by Gargaj Gargaj
I'm with shifter
added on the 2006-10-16 19:05:46 by EviL EviL
nitro2k01: you first abuse the logo submission facility in the lamest way ever possible and now you're telling artists what to do with a logical basis that you don't care what browser others use?
hi kids, vote the graphics not that's extension or browser's
this thread is loly
added on the 2006-10-16 20:19:17 by rbit rbit
I wonder how many more times we're gonna go through this same discussion again.
I think we're on #3 or #4 right now.
added on the 2006-10-16 20:35:42 by Sverker Sverker
i want some 3d-flash-thingy logos. images are so 90's.
added on the 2006-10-16 20:52:37 by annieeee annieeee