pouët.net

pouet 2.0 bugs me beautifull

category: general [glöplog]
Quote:
by AMcBain:
perhaps it's already gone (I can check again tonight)

I did, and it seems to be fine again. No idea. Guess you don't have anything to do!
it'd be nice if i could just thumb up (at least) w/o having to actually say something
all this "yes" and "nice" is as fucking useless as it is boring
added on the 2013-08-27 11:09:45 by superplek superplek
Havoc: the data is still there, I'm just trying to find a logical way to do it instead of the clusterfuck that used to be in 0.9.
added on the 2013-08-27 13:17:48 by Gargaj Gargaj
Hey, i found something, it's not a bug but a link problem.

Under FAQ - ":: general :: i want to ignore this %$#$%#%$ troll! why won't you code an ignore certain user feature?" the Pouet 'attention whores' toggle link not working anymore.

Code:http://www.p01.org/releases/GreaseMonkey_user_scripts/files/pouet_attention_whores_toggle.user.js


and
Code:http://www.pouet.net/changelog.php


also not working for me. Both are under the same FAQ point.
added on the 2013-08-27 15:44:41 by CHEF-KOCH CHEF-KOCH
Also under the same FAQ point, the link to Mozilla's browser should read "Firefox" (instead of the capital middle 'f'). Eventually some pedant was going to point it out ...
Quote:
It does here, maybe it's a problem with this?
I tried this already, but I can 't get it to work in Chrome 28.0.1500.95 m on win7. Editing works perfect but submit doesn't here. It does work in IE 8.7600.16385 though. And obviously the submit button in 'post a new reply' works perfectly well :)
added on the 2013-08-28 23:56:50 by numtek numtek
I wanted to add a release date for this demo. Since I do not remember the month but only the year I left the month field empty and only changed the year. The "success" message appeared but nothing was added.
added on the 2013-08-29 17:18:45 by StingRay StingRay
Fixed.
added on the 2013-08-29 17:36:08 by Gargaj Gargaj
Works like a charme now, thanks for the fix! :)
added on the 2013-08-29 17:45:54 by StingRay StingRay
When browsing the web I always tend to use Ctrl+MouseWheel to zoom the pages, since I've got a small monitor with a high resolution. It's easier for me to read if I scale the websites up. For the bbs it's worked great, until a thread with a very long title appeared, breaking the layout as follows:
BB Image
Could you please perhaps enforce that every row has the same height (i.e. trade width from other cells instead of growing in height)? That'd be grand :)
added on the 2013-08-30 11:22:42 by xTr1m xTr1m
also proper word-wrap when zooming maybe? if that's fixable.
Layout shouldn't change when zooming should it? Are you changing the page scaling instead of zooming?
added on the 2013-08-30 13:07:01 by psonice psonice
bug : text in code tags is always left trimmed : spaces are removed thus indentation is lost
added on the 2013-08-30 15:46:17 by Tigrou Tigrou
This is on the to-fix list.
This was released in a "2SID Competition", dunno if it's worth adding a compo type for. The other entries are even less intro-ish and don't belong here anyway.
added on the 2013-08-31 09:04:39 by tomaes tomaes
Regarding my bug report: a simple fix would be to replace the space with   in the dates of the post.
added on the 2013-08-31 12:13:24 by xTr1m xTr1m
xtr1m: the title is already in two lines, there's no point forcing the date into a single line especially if it will cripple the title even more.

noby: noted. (derp.)

tomaes: i guess we could have an "other" compo?
added on the 2013-08-31 12:51:53 by Gargaj Gargaj
not a bug but missing feature : where is the "missing_stuff.php" page ?
added on the 2013-08-31 12:56:08 by Tigrou Tigrou
In that case, I'd prefer "misc.". :)

(Could be confusing in the long run though, esp. in case of more than one of those per party, etc.)
added on the 2013-08-31 12:57:03 by tomaes tomaes
Tigrou: what's that?
added on the 2013-08-31 13:06:18 by Gargaj Gargaj
Was quite useful to find prods without screenshots and nfo files etc. I used it a couple of times.
added on the 2013-08-31 13:13:11 by tomaes tomaes
Quote:
ranked: 13rd

...And that's of course why we need a switch statement with 100 cases like in 0.9 again! :D

login