pouët.net

A new "Websites" category on pouet.net

category: general [glöplog]
word. :D
added on the 2006-04-25 09:09:45 by kelsey kelsey
I think katastro.fi was cracked once, so there goes your theory ;)
added on the 2006-04-25 12:37:33 by Shifter Shifter
We should do this, purely so that we can have a page on Pouet for Pouet, and then someone can add a page actually about the Pouet page on Pouet, which everyone thinks is a dumb idea so they create a page about the page about Pouet on Pouet so that they can thumb it down.

Or not. Basically, I don't think there's much sense in adding this until Pouet actually covers all things that are unquestionably scene productions (read: standalone music and gfx), and I'm not sure if even that's a sane thing to do.
added on the 2006-04-25 15:16:16 by gasman gasman
True. A page about the page about the page about the page about the page about the page about the page about the page about the page about the page about the page about the page about the page (...) about Pouet on Pouet is not a practical idea.

Just so you Just so you Just so you Just so you know that you just know.
added on the 2006-04-25 16:02:29 by bdk bdk
is this new website category proposal only related to the new chiptune.untergrund.net ???

Guardian: considering the awesome code work on chiptune.com, a "website" category isn't that stupid. A "flash" one could be thought also. but the problem is that those kinda new platforms usually concern people outside the traditional demoscene (la scene canal historique! ;) so i guess it's a no-no for pouet.
added on the 2006-04-26 13:38:52 by Zest Zest
stupid me, flash is already a pouet platform :D

so why not a javascript one ? :>
added on the 2006-04-26 13:43:30 by Zest Zest
Javascript is already a pouet platform too.
added on the 2006-04-26 14:07:51 by Preacher Preacher
it's not about a javascript platform, it's all about promoting scene related websites: you know click, click, enlarge your PR ;)

and ihmo, chiptune is already famous, so it does not need it

login