pouët.net

Would you submit a production to a €100 Linux demo contest?

category: general [glöplog]
Quote:

hitchhikr, that is simply not true. first of all, "most opengl based productions" is not "all opengl based productions", and that is more hurtful as it seems, as some of those productions that do not work at all are significantly more popular. e.g. mfx' deities crashes right at the beginning in 70% of all runs.


I'm delighted to know that most != all.
Grab the video if there's any and voila.

Quote:

additionally, apart from the licensing issue, the linux gfx drivers from nvidia are decent and awesome (they perform even better than with windows), i cant say anything about the ati drivers tho.


ATI drivers are everything but "decent and awesome".

Quote:

inally you seem to believe that money can be freely moved around. do you think that if i handed my €100 to nvidia, they would spit out better drivers? this monetary amount is insignificant for any project. even the wine project will not spit out a better d3d9 emulation just because i gave them a hundred bucks.


But where does he get all those crazy ideas about me ?

The future of these drivers isn't within my reach nor yours.
All you could do, eventually, is to send a mail to the people behind wine to tell'em to fix their fucked up pe loader and also the never-returning-to-desktop fullscreen mode and pointing them the files that don't work (prolly all the stuff packed with kkrunchy or crinkler or even my own packer + anything else that mess with the standard pe file structure in a way or another).

And after all: it's your money, if you feel like giving it then give it.
added on the 2006-06-17 07:39:59 by hitchhikr hitchhikr
Quote:
Grab the video if there's any and voila.


a video? you are a heartless cynist. *sob*

Quote:
ATI drivers are everything but "decent and awesome".


not that the windows drivers would be any better... but i heard ati has made progress.

Quote:
All you could do, eventually, is to send a mail to the people behind wine to tell'em to fix their fucked up pe loader and also the never-returning-to-desktop fullscreen mode and pointing them the files that don't work (prolly all the stuff packed with kkrunchy or crinkler or even my own packer + anything else that mess with the standard pe file structure in a way or another).


i am constantly reporting bugs to the wine project and also serve as a testing spacemonkey, but i only report my own shit. if you notice that stuff, do it yourself.

Quote:
And after all: it's your money, if you feel like giving it then give it.


thank you, no more questions ;)
added on the 2006-06-17 11:44:06 by paniq paniq
BB Image

shifter... awesome... :D


BTW: Would you go for a Saturn demo for 500 EUR? See http://www.rockin-b.de/c4/2006/ and Ojuice news.
added on the 2006-06-17 13:00:31 by freeze freeze
Quote:
not that the windows drivers would be any better... but i heard ati has made progress


Sadly, ATI's windows drivers are actually very good in comparison with their linux drivers.
added on the 2006-06-17 13:19:18 by bruce bruce
yes i'm hearing that several times now. sad to hear. :/
added on the 2006-06-17 13:45:51 by paniq paniq
It'd perhaps be less pointless to have an "open-source democompo" rather than a compo specific to a single variant of Unix on a single hardware architecture.

Releasing stuff in binary-only format doesn't really work in the Unix world. This is especially the case with GNU/Linux that sn't even really binary-compatible with itself.
good idea. why not hold the competition on an entirely abstract hardware and platform. we show each other the licences and diagrams of our demos and then hand a prize to the best one. an abstract proforma prize of course.

honestly: you gotta do it on some kind of materially manifested system that is mature enough. of course, i concern most about the system that i use, which happens to be linux on x86. therefore, its a linux on x86 competition.

if you care for open source, organize an additional prize for contributions that provide source. i prefer open source, but i also respect the wish of contributors. "open source" is not mandatory for a demo to run. sometimes, there is also code being used that _can_ not be released because of some weird licence shit. i know at least one group that has this problem. i dont want to appear offensive by asking for too much.

releasing stuff in binary-only works even on linux. you just gotta do it right. if you fail at that, you have no skills :) - however: providing sources with your demo usually makes sure that they still run in several years. we know the problem with ms products whenever they drop support for an api or platform.
added on the 2006-06-17 17:10:19 by paniq paniq
yay for i-ching, tho.
added on the 2006-06-17 17:13:26 by paniq paniq
Let's all release all our demos in DVD-Video. It's for the best.
added on the 2006-06-17 17:17:41 by xernobyl xernobyl
haha. with drm or without? country code? and the rips? divx? mpg? wmv?
added on the 2006-06-17 17:22:19 by paniq paniq
.flv ofcourse.
added on the 2006-06-17 17:30:39 by Shifter Shifter
I agree with viznut here.

Also, people (yes the very 2 of them) might consider running your demos on non-x86 hardware (like 64bit or even ppc). In that case binary only releases would kinda suck (as they do anyway).
added on the 2006-06-17 17:51:14 by bruce bruce
of course they suck, but thats not my point.
added on the 2006-06-17 17:56:53 by paniq paniq
BUT THEY ARE 100% NATIVE!
added on the 2006-06-17 18:59:19 by Gargaj Gargaj
"Native" is an obsolete term. Please refer to them as "First Nations People." Thank you.
why are they changing the names all the time. what is this, newspeak?
added on the 2006-06-18 02:24:27 by paniq paniq
see? you cant even agree on the form a production should be released in.

really sounds like a great demo platform to me.



added on the 2006-06-18 11:51:22 by smash smash
And they haven't the whole set of endless discussions that allowable / not-allowed libraries or languages can open! :)
added on the 2006-06-18 12:19:09 by _-_-__ _-_-__
smash: i dont understand? this is not an official discussion.

my opinion is that we orient on the standard that demo writing on windows has set, with occasional modifications to accomodate the different infrastructure on linux.

this should never be a ideological discussion, but a pragmatical discussion.

"what i believe in" < "what works best"

and windows does not work best. :)
added on the 2006-06-18 15:29:17 by paniq paniq
Quote:
and windows does not work best

except for the video and audio drivers?
added on the 2006-06-18 15:34:11 by the_Ye-Ti the_Ye-Ti
Once again, send the blame to where it belongs, the driver manufacturers and not the os :-)

That's also what Microsoft itself does :-)
added on the 2006-06-18 16:03:08 by sparcus sparcus
my network, video and audio drivers work very well. that is because i took care i buy a computer that is not bundled to the os by using hardware which only provides windows drivers.

shuttle xpc with nforce board, nv6800gt, works.

acer aspire 5652, works (wireless, bluetooth, graphics, sound ...)

funny about the latter one: vista doesnt work with the soundcard. :>
added on the 2006-06-18 16:19:56 by paniq paniq
sparcus: hmm windows without any drivers loaded works as good as linux without any drivers loaded?
added on the 2006-06-18 16:31:12 by the_Ye-Ti the_Ye-Ti
i also agree with viznut. binary-only releases on unix platforms suck.
added on the 2006-06-18 17:02:30 by nosfe nosfe
Windows works fine - what's the point?
added on the 2006-06-18 17:19:23 by jua jua

login