madwizards!
category: general [glöplog]
BAD WIZARDS
I think i still have some Intel Outside stickers around, and 2 Powered by Amiga stickers ;p
deadwizards
superplek, you know what. you pretty much sound like an underdeveloped creature with inferiority complex, lacking what we call self-esteem. no offence - how the truth can be offensive, huh?
How about giving someone a spellchecker and a sense of gammar, boys and girls?
That's quality from BOLANDSYE ;)
Oh and Flapjack, the 1980's called. They want Poland back.
shifter, I assume you were not picking on me? in case you were, navigate through my post and the embarassing errors I have done.
superplek, how high-flown your sense of humour is...
Yes, everybody "does embarassing errors" :))
BAL
FASZ
$!^@*$!
FASZ
$!^@*$!
well, that was indeed a typo :) embarrassing.
I wouldn't call them embarassing mistakes per se, but yes, I was picking on you, Flapjack.
As for your desired corrections, I'm currently arguing over the meaning of the last sentence. You might want to help us. I shared this problem with a linguist (who loves your post for it's "spanish immigrant" style) but we can't agree on what the hell you're trying to say. Please clarify:
Are you trying to state that you're not offensive because you're stating the truth, or are you stating that you're trying not to be offensive, even though the truth *is* offensive?
Are you trying to state that you're not offensive because you're stating the truth, or are you stating that you're trying not to be offensive, even though the truth *is* offensive?
I think I'll present superplek with a gold level BALFASZ t-shirt at Breakpoint, in the name of all the Madwizards posse.
I like your twisted logics Shifter-twister. As for the 'immigrant style', I would like you to know I have been awarded Cambridge Certificafe of Profciency in English with grade A :) As you might have heard somewhere (I assume you read books, occasionally turn on the news on the tv), some people are able to build more sophisticated sentences that you do. What's more, most of the people do not need a linguist to follow a sentence that is simply clear. But for the sake of your curiosity:
I am stating that superplek is underdeveloped creature with inferiority complex - clear enough?
Then I remark that this comparison might be somewhat offensive. But the there's this flash of insight. I am not offensive since this is how he really is. And it is not an example of "offensive behaviour" when one refers to the facts.
To sum up (call it final remarks), calling George W Bush a crook would not be offensive, because he is indeed a crook (it used to be that politicians would wait until they were in
office to become crooks, this one came prepackaged). Calling John Kerry would, because he is not a crook :)
So instead of picking on my English (which is I boastfully believe better than yours), try to write something that actually make sense. What you are doing now is nothing but bullshitting. I recommend you ridicule my English-language skills by showing how good you are, because for the moment you sound like a kid clamoring for publicity. So write something rich in imagery, sure in logics, profound in characterization of my primitive English, dazzling in its descriptive powers and just haunting with bold, elegant and rich vocab. By the time you come up with anything similiar to that, you are mercifully allowed to lick my balls until they get that wonderful gloss...
:)
I am stating that superplek is underdeveloped creature with inferiority complex - clear enough?
Then I remark that this comparison might be somewhat offensive. But the there's this flash of insight. I am not offensive since this is how he really is. And it is not an example of "offensive behaviour" when one refers to the facts.
To sum up (call it final remarks), calling George W Bush a crook would not be offensive, because he is indeed a crook (it used to be that politicians would wait until they were in
office to become crooks, this one came prepackaged). Calling John Kerry would, because he is not a crook :)
So instead of picking on my English (which is I boastfully believe better than yours), try to write something that actually make sense. What you are doing now is nothing but bullshitting. I recommend you ridicule my English-language skills by showing how good you are, because for the moment you sound like a kid clamoring for publicity. So write something rich in imagery, sure in logics, profound in characterization of my primitive English, dazzling in its descriptive powers and just haunting with bold, elegant and rich vocab. By the time you come up with anything similiar to that, you are mercifully allowed to lick my balls until they get that wonderful gloss...
:)
And since you are a Dutch and I am a Pole, and the whole thread is somewhat picking on Poles
(be it on purpose or not), I got a nice joke for all of ya out there...
Flapjack is having his petit dejeuner (coffee, croissants, bread, butter jam Shifter, that's what it is in case your fellow linguist doesn't follow) when
a Dutch man named Shifter, chewing gum, sits down next to him.
Flapjack ignores the Shifter who, nevertheless, starts a conversation.
Shifter: "You Poland folk eat the whole bread??" - speaking with than quasi-slang, definitely not an immigrant-style sort of English.
Flpjack: "Of course."
Shifter: (after blowing a huge bubble) "We dont. In the Netherlands, we only eat what is inside. The crusts we collect in a container, recycle it, transform them into croissants and sell them to Poland."
Shifter has a smirk on his face. Flapjack listens in silence.
Shifter persists: "Dya eat jelly with the bread??" - definitely not an immigrant sort of style, ain't it?
Flapjack: "Of Course." Shifter: (cracking his gum between his teeth and chuckling). "We dont. In the Netherlands we eat fresh fruit for breakfast, then we put all the peels, seeds, and leftovers in containers, recycle them, transform them into jam and sell the jam to Poland."
The Flapjack then asks: "Do you have sex in Netherlands?"
Shifter: "Why of course we do", the Shifter says with a big smirk.
Flapjack: And what do you do with the condoms once you've used them?"
Shifter: "We throw them away, of course."
Flapjack: "We dont. In Poland, we put them in a container, recycle them, melt them down into chewing gum and sell them to Netherlands."
(be it on purpose or not), I got a nice joke for all of ya out there...
Flapjack is having his petit dejeuner (coffee, croissants, bread, butter jam Shifter, that's what it is in case your fellow linguist doesn't follow) when
a Dutch man named Shifter, chewing gum, sits down next to him.
Flapjack ignores the Shifter who, nevertheless, starts a conversation.
Shifter: "You Poland folk eat the whole bread??" - speaking with than quasi-slang, definitely not an immigrant-style sort of English.
Flpjack: "Of course."
Shifter: (after blowing a huge bubble) "We dont. In the Netherlands, we only eat what is inside. The crusts we collect in a container, recycle it, transform them into croissants and sell them to Poland."
Shifter has a smirk on his face. Flapjack listens in silence.
Shifter persists: "Dya eat jelly with the bread??" - definitely not an immigrant sort of style, ain't it?
Flapjack: "Of Course." Shifter: (cracking his gum between his teeth and chuckling). "We dont. In the Netherlands we eat fresh fruit for breakfast, then we put all the peels, seeds, and leftovers in containers, recycle them, transform them into jam and sell the jam to Poland."
The Flapjack then asks: "Do you have sex in Netherlands?"
Shifter: "Why of course we do", the Shifter says with a big smirk.
Flapjack: And what do you do with the condoms once you've used them?"
Shifter: "We throw them away, of course."
Flapjack: "We dont. In Poland, we put them in a container, recycle them, melt them down into chewing gum and sell them to Netherlands."
"iblis, look who's talking."
??? dalezey, and that supposed to mean? what, excactly?
??? dalezey, and that supposed to mean? what, excactly?
touchy *touchy*, aren't we? :)
Quote:
What's more, most of the people do not need a linguist to follow a sentence that is simply clear.
Neither do I. Fact is that she took interest in my petty amusement and we disagreed about the meaning of your final sentence. :)
Kindly take note of the fact that I was merely fulfilling your request. No need to get all dubmood on me.
Okay, you might have misinterpreted my sentence because it was complex. Yet, it is to be stated that it was all in accordance with English grammar, logics etc.
And I am not angry, I am just bouncing back the ball :) I can even stop if you tell me where to download that silly game you were playing on the bigscreen at TUM, hehe.
say flapjack, are there any hookers in poland? i've been living in amsterdam for 2 weeks now and it seems they all moved here! :) (same goes for czech and hungarian btw.. ) i now live really close to 'the redlight district' so i know! (and yes, i'm lonely.. so i 'know' too! hehe)
and do not ever call 'Rez' a silly game (and it is not for pc as far as i can remember, get a dreamcast or a ps2)
and do not ever call 'Rez' a silly game (and it is not for pc as far as i can remember, get a dreamcast or a ps2)