pouët.net

Pouet reported to IWF.

category: residue [glöplog]
they're too busy going after torrent sites anyway.
added on the 2009-12-17 12:00:29 by Gargaj Gargaj
Reading this thread makes me yearn back to the day when there was a big ol' television on every table corner at demoparties, showing any sort of bizarre, hardcore porn. Not because people were sexually aroused by it (I guess, I can mainly speak for myself)) but more as a sort of test of how much one can take. I guess this was back in the 90s before childporn was prohibited in Denmark. I even remember a scener who thought that prohibiting it was very wrong, thus ending up in some heated discussions with some people.

And Wade, come on, no scener should report another scener to the police/authorities unless it's for theft, murder or violence. It's totally against the origin and spirit of the scene. Maybe you've been in the UK for too long - the BBC even has warnings about swearing and sexual humour before their shows these days.

Neo-puritans and other people who worry too much, will you please piss off and stop infecting media with your ridiculous hypocracy?
added on the 2009-12-17 12:48:31 by curt_cool curt_cool
Quote:
Reading this thread makes me yearn back to the day when there was a big ol' television on every table corner at demoparties, showing any sort of bizarre, hardcore porn.

Bollocks- Maybe this was the case in Denmark, but certainly not everywhere else.
added on the 2009-12-17 13:42:48 by havoc havoc
curt_cool, well obviously wade isn't a scener.
added on the 2009-12-17 16:26:20 by nosfe nosfe
It certainly was the case in Sweden up into the late 90's. Not CP, but beastiality, scat, etc.
added on the 2009-12-17 16:27:09 by Radiant Radiant
there was a tv on every corner showing that..?
added on the 2009-12-17 16:28:58 by havoc havoc
Quote:
Reading this thread makes me yearn back to the day when there was a big ol' television on every table corner at demoparties, showing any sort of bizarre, hardcore porn. Not because people were sexually aroused by it (I guess, I can mainly speak for myself)) but more as a sort of test of how much one can take.


I like how you bring this like this is a completely normal matter-of-fact thing. Hint dude, it's not :D I remember being astonished at some Scandis watching terrible porn at TP'98. You guys probably had it rough or something, but that shit surely wasn't everywhere.
added on the 2009-12-17 16:44:56 by okkie okkie
Quote:

No doubt about it. But in relation to child-molesting? really?...

Quote:

Yep, I definitely believe so. When parliament polled to lower the age of gay consent to 16, there was an overwhelming majority in favour. I'm sure if they could lower it even further they would (not that age of consent stops them).

Are you saying that the politicians are child molesters because a majority wanted to lower the age of consent for gay sex to the same age as for straight sex?
added on the 2009-12-17 19:20:41 by hollowman hollowman
Quote:
Reading this thread makes me yearn back to the day when there was a big ol' television on every table corner at demoparties, showing any sort of bizarre, hardcore porn.


ah, i remember that from TP'95... ~30 people watching animal porn on a very big tv while 10-12yr old gamer kids were running around... i filed it away as some danish thing :)
added on the 2009-12-17 20:05:49 by blala blala
Quote:
And Wade, come on, no scener should report another scener to the police/authorities unless it's for theft, murder or violence. It's totally against the origin and spirit of the scene.


ATH500 is not a scener, plus he was the one who maliciously attacked Pouet with a spam script. As I've explained to Gargaj and numerous people here, I didn't report Pouet to get Pouet into trouble, my intention was to point the IWF to a lead, which they could then follow to the source. That is to say, I credited them as intelligent individuals who could tell the difference between a scene site that had been sabotaged by some idiot and the original host and uploader of this material.


Quote:
Are you saying that the politicians are child molesters because a majority wanted to lower the age of consent for gay sex to the same age as for straight sex?


Who else benefits from lowering the age of consent (straight or gay) from 18 to 16? Ironically, 16 year olds don't even get a say in the matter and you don't see many politicians campaigning for their right to vote.

added on the 2009-12-17 22:42:01 by Wade Wade
For the record, I've just had an update from IWF who stated they are NOT pursuing Pouet as there was no child porn found here, but Interpol are investigating the source of the material.

Seems I was right and they can tell the difference afterall.
added on the 2009-12-17 22:49:49 by Wade Wade
Yes its OK now Wade, we completely understood your action (at least I did back in Bitfellas) and there is no need to feel guilt or annoyed by this. ;-)

Quote:
For the record, I've just had an update from IWF who stated they are NOT pursuing Pouet as there was no child porn found here, but Interpol are investigating the source of the material.

Seems I was right and they can tell the difference after all.


This is quite good news indeed!

The right people doing the right job.
added on the 2009-12-18 13:36:56 by Defiance Defiance
Quote:
One thing I do agree with that also got to me was the lighthearted reactions to this post. It's been over a week now and those pictures are still playing on my mind.


I think few people actually saw those images people are talking about. I've replied to that thread with a humorous picture, but i didn't even realize what the whole thread was about at the time.

Ban ATH500, delete all his posts, threads, comments on prods etc. Everything. Burn the motherfucker.
added on the 2009-12-18 16:48:44 by kurli kurli
Quote:
ATH500 is not a scener, plus he was the one who maliciously attacked Pouet with a spam script.

Quote:
Ban ATH500, delete all his posts, threads, comments on prods etc. Everything. Burn the motherfucker.

and it wouldnt be half as sad if he wouldve taken the effort to hide his personal info
added on the 2009-12-18 17:18:53 by Gargaj Gargaj
well he kindof tried by using fake data for the domain registration...

...not that it took more than a couple minutes to google full details tho
added on the 2009-12-18 17:36:24 by havoc havoc
let's spam his website with carebears!
And then let's perform a DDoS Attack just for the fun of it!
added on the 2009-12-18 19:29:47 by Defiance Defiance
DDos attack on what?
added on the 2009-12-18 19:34:51 by panic panic
pascalnet.net?
or simply take the site down and change index with childp0rns more fun. :o
added on the 2009-12-18 19:40:57 by panic panic
Yeap! The last idea is better (about taking the site down), and then we will report the site to IWF and Interpool just for the sweetness of it!
added on the 2009-12-18 19:49:39 by Defiance Defiance
BB Image
added on the 2009-12-18 21:40:05 by kb_ kb_
"Price money" .. priceless..
added on the 2009-12-18 21:47:20 by trc_wm trc_wm
Quote:
I wouldn't call being disturbed by child pornography and murder having a "weak stomach" or "fragile psyche". It's about being able to empathise with the victims and their pain and feeling some emotional reaction over it.


I didn't say you were wrong to be disgusted and uncomfortable. I'm sure I would have felt the same way and would have had to fight an acute urge to kill someone. But to complain as if seeing these images was somehow an injustice towards me, to demand that "something gets done" so that I don't have to see such disgusting things ever again, and so I don't get harrassed by the police, seems incredibly selfish.

The real victims are the children depicted, all the sympathy goes to them. And when the police turn good people into suspected paedophiles for doing their civic duty, then the police are at fault. Strongly so. You can't blame Pouet for the British police being sadistic thugs, nor can you blame Pouet for how these children were abused in the first place. And you can't expect everyone else to go out of their way to shield you from the harsh realities of the world. Cause if you do, people will make fun of you. Especially here in the troll pit.
added on the 2009-12-20 21:58:16 by doomdoom doomdoom
Doom: I did say before that the report was not a case of getting rid of the images because they offended me. The very reason it stirred such a strong emotional reaction in me and the need to do something (anything) is because I empathise with the kids involved. There's nothing worse than child abuse in my opinion and if it was upto me I'd have all paedophiles removed from existence.

I don't blame Pouet for those things, but unfortunately Pouet was where I saw them. Had I seen them on Youtube I'd have reported Youtube and so on. I just wanted someone to trace them and try to put an end to it, which is of course very naive of me to expect.
added on the 2009-12-21 01:40:06 by Wade Wade

login