pouët.net

the so complete pouët.net oneliner

• 2009-12-14
• 23:57 why is that the people who want to open others' eyes always ultimately come across as misantrophic? imean in the end, do you want to help or do you just want to be right?
• 2009-12-15
• 00:06 gargaj: srsly, it's hard when you see ppl falling for the same old tricks over and over. then, your desire to "help" turns to distain.
• 00:09 Both propably. but I think you are confused. The way we have chosen to be fucked up the arse on a daily basis is misantrophic. Im not, that is why I am angry!
• 00:09 I'm not the one who's mad, it's everybody else! WHY CAN'T THEY SEE???
• 00:10 how many times in history have that very thing happened? that sometimes a single guy had to go up against everybpdy else because they were flat wrong? I can think of a few actually. Nice try tho...
• 00:14 I can think of millions of people who were proved wrong. That outweighs your few who were proved right.
• 00:17 I am sure that Galileo would agree with you on that. Not that I make comparison. Quality or Quantity?
• 00:18 I'm gonna invoke Godwin's law here and say that Hitler would agree with you.
• 00:20 How many times in history has a whole people been utterly wrong about what they throught was right (because that is what authority told them). But it would never happen to you, you are way to smart for that obviously.
• 00:21 But maybe we should give up democracy and the scientific method because of a few historical mavericks. And Galileo was fighting the Church with science. You're fighting science with ignorance.
• 00:22 funny. in this precise situation, we have many authorities saying both extreme sides of the medal.
• 00:25 thank you for the strawman, should I light it on fire or do you want to? Climatechange is really a religious movement, it has got nothing to do with science. Yeah the same way creationsim has
• 00:25 I declare the winner to be: Not the people arguing about crap on the pouet oneliner, but the ones with some power to decide.
• 00:26 psonice, thank you so much for your valuable input. It is good to know there are people like yourself who makes these calls on a day to day basis.
• 00:27 Well if you want to cling to cherry picked evidence that supports your own presumptions fair enough. If there is a real debate here it's over people's understanding of complex issues at hand, and the responsibility of the media to deliver a balanced vie
• 00:27 well as long as you don't study your cause yourself it's religion it's based on belief, not science.
• 00:29 ### illegal oneliner capacity ###
• 00:30 The chery picking was made by the AGW team as the last 4 weeks of investigations has demonstrated quite clearly.
• 00:32 insect: i suggest you look into what we're dealing with here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/02/al-gore-our-choice-environment-clima te it is precisely a religion. you are not supposed to understand a use scientific reason, you are supposed to b
• 00:33 Link to something that suggests they cherry picked please.
• 00:36 BELIEVE!!!
• 00:36 http://wattsupwiththat.com/ http://www.climatedepot.com/ you could start http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/19/breaking-news-story-hadley-cru-has-apparen tly-been-hacked-hundreds-of-files-released/ and work your way forward from there
• 00:38 do you have to debate this on the onliner, too? <.<
• 00:39 Al Gore is an oaf and not a credible ambassador for climatology.
• 00:44 he's not an abassadore, he's your messenger. sent by the Lord to translate the word of Gaia.