the so complete pouët.net oneliner
- 2012-05-10
-
Rubbeldiekatz... -
The hoff in an incredible star wars ripoff fighting giant stop motion robots while wearing too much makeup.. wat? http://io9.com/5909094/some-of-the-cheesiest-movie-moments-of-all-time/gallery/1 2 -
We've come a loooong way... :D -
know your fucking classics, man... - Fucking classics, you mean, like, Rocky Siffredo movies ? ;)
-
Say my name http://www.youtube.com/watch?hl=en&v=1iNbHSN5jec -
Star Crash is the shit! -
StarCrash indeed but... WOW! David Hasselhoff shooting lasers from his eyes! -
These deadly rays will be your death!!! -
SCAN IT WITH OUR COMPUTER WAVES -
very demo-ish - >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcuvJXhrMak -
mashups, eh ? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YU2qoL3XGyM -
I've just heard the story about the "Austin Powers" of the scene... -
H0ffman, you do realise it's the iTunes visualiser? -
crashes indeed.. but wow! NOOON.. -
oh behave! - fukushimaaaaah !
-
SUPERFROG! -
I never thought about this, but if you have: for(size_t i = 0; i < someVector.size(); i++), will someVector.size() get evaluated each loop? -
yes -
for is equivalent to while, so I would say yes, since you can use a variable there -
Yes, but it's probably inlined and has constant time anyway (something like return end-begin;) -
If the compiler is certain that the size won't change while in the for loop it will probably optimize it.. but I wouldn't bet on it :) -
yeah.. "for (i=0; i<strlen(str); i++)" was often used as example of bad practice for that reason, but i never understood why you'd do that rather than "for (i=0; str[i]; i++)" anyway (ofcourse assuming basic C strings) - Probably because it "sounds" more intuitive...