the so complete pouët.net oneliner
- 2016-02-07
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bc65K9N5LI -
the turing machine... in Brittany. - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Amzp7W0RkPA
- Ils sont fous ces romains dans Asterix.
-
What was the demo with samples from tune N.Y.C. Everything? -
http://imgur.com/a/flJ2e -
www.soundcloud.com/skyrunner_bc/weed-grow-ops -
Klitoraldetonation - Im even too stupid to post a link -.-
-
the most cowbell ever. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxVcNYsKwLA -
Papa Smurf - 242 (Infinite Loop Auto-Edit) http://labs.echonest.com/Uploader/index.html?trid=TRVHOXN152BC555197&thresh= 15 -
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/whatsapp-group-cha ts-bigger-maximum-size-256-people-users-a6856491.html "It's not clear why WhatsApp settled on such an oddly specific number" - 2016-02-08
-
in all fairness, it is an "oddly specific number" - Considering that we standardized on an 8-bit byte over 50 years ago, which nicely adds up to 256 values, I don't think it's that oddly specific within the context of tech.
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQad45HpBCk
- Knoeki: yes but if you're storing on 8bit, you can only have 0-255; but that's not even as weird as trying to store something like that on 8 (or even 9) bits.
- 0-255 still adds up to 256 values, though. I do get your point, but I feel like someone reporting on tech should probably not be surprised or confused about a number like 256
-
could it be related to ipv4/ipv6 multicast protocol limitations? just guessing, never used it myself - You're On The Global Frequency
- 1in10: you are right, doesn't make sense, probably just their own higher-level protocol limitation
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Frequency
- lol, and I thought about global multicast between networks, nevermind then ;)
- =D
-
whatsapp sux anyway. telegram ftw. -
I prefer smoke signals.