128b parallax starfield
screenshot added by 98041634 on 2003-12-12 23:47:46
platform :
type :
release date : december 2003
  • 7
  • 6
  • 3
popularity : 59%
  • 0.25
alltime top: #13772
added on the 2003-12-12 23:47:45 by 98041634 98041634

popularity helper

increase the popularity of this prod by spreading this URL:

or via: facebook twitter pinterest tumblr


I don't mean to starfield, but I uploaded a 142b starfield and Jazzman said "bah... do it in 128b next time" so I did :o)

btw don't ask for 64b, it won't happen
added on the 2003-12-12 23:50:07 by 98041634 98041634
hahaha, excellent attitude :)
rulez added on the 2003-12-13 00:31:23 by Gargaj Gargaj
didn't pascal do this in 20?
aw cumon! :o)
added on the 2003-12-13 00:39:06 by 98041634 98041634
ile: yep, it's here. I've heard of a 19bytes version too.
added on the 2003-12-13 00:54:16 by p01 p01
wtf, where is your blinking logo?
added on the 2003-12-13 01:18:55 by noname noname
Wow, that is pretty slick. btw, what blinking logo, what?
added on the 2003-12-13 02:03:31 by 98041634 98041634
It's pretty nice. But please don't post each new smaller version to pouet.net. (yes, I'm damn bitter you dropped our prod from the latest prods list! :)
rulez added on the 2003-12-13 11:17:14 by uutee uutee
i feel an awesome power flowing through my hands as i type. well done, man, here's your thumb.
rulez added on the 2003-12-13 18:26:03 by jazzman jazzman
Well, that 20 byte starfield didn't look nearly as starfield-ish as this one here, so a thumb. But it does tend to place too many stars in the middle line and flicker at the top...
rulez added on the 2003-12-13 21:27:45 by crusader crusader
You're right - well spotted - the extra code in the original 142b version is responsible for evenly distributing stars and avoiding that slight flicker... :o)
added on the 2003-12-14 01:59:54 by 98041634 98041634
128bytes, 64bytes, 1gig, 1byte it doesn't matter cos this looks crap.
sucks added on the 2003-12-14 03:48:11 by Shanethewolf Shanethewolf
Well, you may be right - but starfields are nice, and coding anything nice to a 128 byte limit is a perfectly respectable design goal.... If you can do a 128b starfield that looks at all better, or even a 1GB one that looks more than 8 million times better, I'd love to see it.
added on the 2003-12-16 13:55:19 by 98041634 98041634
I think a starfield always look more or less the same :)
added on the 2003-12-19 15:54:11 by dEpressio dEpressio
sucks added on the 2003-12-19 17:03:45 by defjam defjam
I totally second shane
sucks added on the 2004-08-13 03:16:21 by asasel asasel
Pretty cool
rulez added on the 2007-04-06 15:50:57 by indi indi
Nothing special.
rulez added on the 2008-05-01 19:10:04 by Pirx Pirx
added on the 2009-09-22 00:16:51 by toxie toxie
smooth (=
rulez added on the 2013-05-26 10:07:27 by sensenstahl sensenstahl

submit changes

if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,

do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.

instead, click here !

[previous edits]

add a comment