screenshot added by  on
platform :
type :
release date : february 2001
release party : MindReSources 2001
compo : pc 512b
ranked : 1st
  • rulez 7
  • is ok 3
  • sucks 4
popularity : 57%
  • rulez 0.21
alltime top: #14434
added on the 2001-07-16 13:08:52 by Zone (leZone) Zone (leZone)

popularity helper

increase the popularity of this prod by spreading this URL:

or via: facebook twitter pinterest tumblr


this prod finished 1st of the 512bytes compo (no 512b avaiable on pouet submissions)

good 511 bytes prod
a good effect very fast
sad to see it only in grey, but it rulez for me
rulez added on the 2001-07-16 13:10:30 by Zone (leZone) Zone (leZone)
bah, if i didn't miss anything, this is only a borig something... 90% of available 256byte intros show something better.
sucks added on the 2001-07-16 20:02:43 by PigPen PigPen
Yay, works under win2k... however, it's a tad boring. When you only have 512 bytes your single effect had better not be boring (:

Also, the screenshot doens't really appear to be from the demo, as on my platform, it never does the raybeams... just the elipse. This could be due to win2k - and it could also be why it's boring - in that it's b0rked.
rulez added on the 2002-03-01 15:54:44 by DarkinDesign DarkinDesign
Too simple, even for a 512b
sucks added on the 2003-01-23 02:59:17 by shash shash
According to the name, this demo should shine radiantly and be respledent, it is neither.
sucks added on the 2005-05-28 19:11:42 by rio702 rio702
It would be decent with the raybeams...
sucks added on the 2005-05-28 19:19:35 by Preacher Preacher
A low level bug or a fake screenshot?
added on the 2005-06-08 01:22:56 by bdk bdk
..mistery unveiled: it's a low-level bug, runs perfectly in DosBox!
It's cute!
rulez added on the 2005-06-08 01:29:36 by bdk bdk
BB ImageBB ImageBB ImageBB ImageBB ImageBB ImageBB ImageBB ImageBB ImageBB Image
Ten Thumbs Up!
added on the 2005-06-09 03:01:50 by bdk bdk
calm down broderick... the effect is dull for 512b and there's no FDT, not even a texture.

and please... stop crosslinking your fav prods in other prod comments while being totally offtopic.
added on the 2005-07-14 02:37:27 by PigPen PigPen
From above on this page:
increase the popularity of this prod by spreading this URL:

Am I wrong? :|

But pheraps I can see your point; in fact when I readed your comment/reply I thought: "now I'm going to take some screenshots and post that to pouet, in fact the effect is NOT dull and THERE IS a texture".

So I downloaded the prod and ran DosBox and... Surprise!! O_O The effect looked fucking dull as stated in some of the above comments.

There HAD to be something wrong, sh*t, I remembered that so WELL!

Then after a bit of desperation I got a suspect... the processor under wich DosBox is running!

In fact I was running DosBox on my NB (a Centrino), but the last time I saw refulgence I was on my desktop (a Pentium 4).

So I went to my good'ol desktop and... here below you can finally see the result of my efforts :]]

BB Image

( After all this I suppose my next CDC will be this prod... *8] )

I feel a bit Optimus now...

added on the 2005-07-14 04:14:21 by bdk bdk
you would cdc a prod that produces at your pc only an effect that it is not supposed to show? (sounds like rude 512b memory addressing has a prob on your machine, nothing else)

have you ever experienced really HARD stuff in HALF the size like pouet id 3397 or 4659 ? well.... ok, you changed your opinion now, i guess. point. word.

try 256b.com btw ;)
added on the 2005-07-15 01:26:48 by PigPen PigPen
I know well 256b.com & baze's prods, they rock hard (also Assembler BOT's ones are cute)! :)

The cdc would be for the little "adventure" I had in trying to run that (and btw for the effect itself that imho looks great).

Effectively this nice prod seems to be a Bit particular in hw requirements to run correctly as it can be clearly seen watching some of the above comments.
I would also state that the raw memory adressing in that could have shown a little leak (it's really a leak?) in DosBox'vm implementation in relation to different underlying CPUs.
But who cares now?

Cheers =]
added on the 2005-07-15 01:54:46 by bdk bdk
if the image above doesn't shows here's the link.
added on the 2005-07-15 01:59:01 by bdk bdk
ok, you need 85kb for an stoopid emboss. browse other prods, thread closed ;) too much beer currently to feed the trolls.
added on the 2005-07-15 02:30:11 by PigPen PigPen
pieni piggy

btw altervista seems to fuck up external links to the hosted contents sometimes. Or it's pouet. Or it's the browser. Or wtf.

Troll? I'm stating things pertinent to that prod and to it's visualization issues.
added on the 2005-07-15 08:55:28 by bdk bdk
BB Image
added on the 2005-10-31 18:37:28 by bdk bdk
NICE, remember this
rulez added on the 2007-02-23 01:34:01 by BiTL BiTL
rulez added on the 2007-02-23 10:51:14 by BITS BITS
Time for a fixed final, eh?
added on the 2007-04-04 14:30:22 by T$ T$
Fucking COOL, im my eyes! Quite sophisticated animation, has the end, DAZZLING. One of the best 512B intros for sure.

Unfortunatelly works wrong under Windows XP, also wrong under DOSBox (0.72). Uses the same technique as diz (256B) and Stratium (128B).
rulez added on the 2008-05-01 15:09:55 by Pirx Pirx
nice (=
rulez added on the 2012-12-10 16:48:36 by sensenstahl sensenstahl

submit changes

if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,

do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.

instead, click here !

[previous edits]

add a comment