pouët.net

ep/hugi trying to destroy our demoscene community?

category: general [glöplog]
Ah, anti-pouetization <3
added on the 2008-04-08 07:37:09 by visy visy
thx
added on the 2008-04-08 08:03:47 by xeNusion xeNusion
thx
added on the 2008-04-08 08:04:37 by Zest Zest
Gargaj killed pouet.

thx
added on the 2008-04-08 08:08:48 by micksam7 micksam7
paradox..

no moar funny pics :(
no moar horrible pics :)))))))

gargaj you murderer >:-( / i love you gargday !!1!oneon
added on the 2008-04-08 08:23:32 by SilkCut SilkCut
jesus christ people, what kinda jobs do you have? :D
added on the 2008-04-08 10:37:58 by Gargaj Gargaj
Ones where we're not allowed to watch hardcore gay porn and photos of mangled corpses :) Especially when there are children around now and then
added on the 2008-04-08 10:46:17 by psonice psonice
you're all jerks.
added on the 2008-04-08 10:48:56 by superplek superplek
gargaj - enabling images doesn't work with the preview-button. Otherwise excellent new feature.
added on the 2008-04-08 10:55:15 by hornet hornet
oops. there.
added on the 2008-04-08 10:58:10 by Gargaj Gargaj
psonice: if you're browsing pouet at work, isn't that alone a problem? :)
added on the 2008-04-08 11:01:21 by Gargaj Gargaj
How about giving a little thumbnail preview when you hover the mouse pointer over the link? That way you could easily decide if you want to open this particular picture...
added on the 2008-04-08 12:12:45 by Stebo Stebo
yeah and a quick image processing algo to see whether the picture contains a wang, with user-adjustable threshold of what size of schlongs he or she wants or doesn't want to see :D
added on the 2008-04-08 12:19:09 by Gargaj Gargaj
Yeah, that was my line of thought... :) Will your algorythm put an "actual size" arrow next to the schlongs? That would be ace!
added on the 2008-04-08 12:25:13 by Stebo Stebo
to aptly respond:
BB Image
added on the 2008-04-08 12:52:18 by Gargaj Gargaj
ace indeed, thx for removing the pics
oldskool bbs - fix me beautiful thread
added on the 2008-04-08 by s0m30n3:
"All links to the hugi mirrors are broken! What gives?!"

;)

I don't say that the "no images" option is bad, but, if you people had considered this to be so important you could have started using Greasemonkey or similar stuff ages ago...
added on the 2008-04-08 14:10:18 by raer raer
you can also simply turn off images, or desactivate animated images natively with some browsers.





BUT STILL.
added on the 2008-04-08 14:21:35 by SilkCut SilkCut
Quote:
if you people had considered this to be so important you could have started using Greasemonkey or similar stuff ages ago...

it's ok, some people use werkkzeug instead of coding... i guess it depends on the effort you wanna lay in.
added on the 2008-04-08 14:29:29 by Gargaj Gargaj
gargaj: pouet at work is no problem, so long as the work gets done.

The other thing is that if you're at work, even if nobody can see what you're looking at and get upset, the locations of all the images in the pouet pages get logged in your company's proxy server. Especially if you have software that blocks porn on there, or reports are run to make sure people aren't doing illegal stuff online, that made pouet pretty risky :) Besides, would you want the guy running your proxy server to think you spent your work hours looking at gay porn? ;)
added on the 2008-04-08 15:08:44 by psonice psonice
Gargaj: No offence to you!
[rant]
But that's exactly it. Some people are lazy, but still complain. Others will do the work for them when they bugger them enough... :)
Anyways. Good option.
[/rant]
added on the 2008-04-08 15:26:35 by raer raer
Psonice : not to mention that a gay kinky admin could start hitting on you when discovering that ! :)
added on the 2008-04-08 15:46:00 by keops keops
Not bad, 28 new users in less than 24 hours maybe due to this new feature ?, although i suspect a few of them to be rather fake :]
added on the 2008-04-08 15:54:15 by hitchhikr hitchhikr
"schlong" is easily the funniest word for penis I've read in ages :)
added on the 2008-04-08 15:55:56 by El Topo El Topo
Quote:
it's ok, some people use werkkzeug instead of coding... i guess it depends on the effort you wanna lay in.

Oh no he didn't! Oh SNAP! :)
added on the 2008-04-08 16:22:48 by gloom gloom

login