pouët.net

Bigger screenshots

category: general [glöplog]
I wholeheartedly condone plugins / userscripts btw.
added on the 2018-07-25 15:46:40 by Gargaj Gargaj
me too! i just don't install them or think they solve a problem that they're only masking
added on the 2018-07-25 15:48:43 by havoc havoc
I can't accept the plugin as a solution because there's no reliable association of pouet prods to demozoo entries, it can result in a situation where the pouet that I see is different from the pouet that others see (this can be frustrating), and to set a bigger screenshot for my prod I need to go over and add it to demozoo.
added on the 2018-07-25 16:22:38 by fizzer fizzer
Havoc: AHA!!!! So you DO consider the screen shot sizes a problem!

\:)/
added on the 2018-07-25 17:26:33 by farfar farfar
Thumb for Pandur and LJ for the idea alone.
added on the 2018-07-25 22:00:30 by Virgill Virgill
pandur: nice! little bug report: the plugin overrides the filtering on _all_ images on the site though from interpolated (auto?? in CSS?) to crisp/pixelated. at least in latest Chrome and when zoomed in 125% which kinda makes all the icons and avatars look fuglier than they already are ;)
added on the 2018-07-25 22:31:03 by Maali Maali
How about we let the users decide? Like gloom says on previous page, it's more about the page layout that becomes very clumsy for those with ultra-wide screens. The screenshot supposed to be a sneak peek, a little choppiness doesn't really matter.

We already have the awesome customöolobstormaziabletic 7004+ super MK2!. Wouldn't the easiest possible option be to allow users to allow the browser to nearest-neighbor scale the screenshots (default: 1.6x to go from 400 to 640) and make the layout more accessible for our 4k friends?

About the possibility to upload future screenshots in 640x480 or higher, I have no opinion. Anything goes.
added on the 2018-07-26 08:44:57 by Trilkk Trilkk
^ That would probably be super-easy with an userscript too though.
added on the 2018-07-26 08:46:30 by Trilkk Trilkk
please do all your scaling in a userscript indeed (and don't forget to explain users of the script why oldskool stuff suddenly looks shit)
added on the 2018-07-26 09:15:28 by havoc havoc
We're beginning to mix many different things here; "bigger screenshots" wouldn't be mandatory, it just mean a larger cap for the size and a fixed size thumbnail if needed - a 320x240 shot would remain 320x240.
added on the 2018-07-26 09:42:26 by Gargaj Gargaj
until some schmuck decides to upscale it for real estate reasons
added on the 2018-07-26 10:09:06 by havoc havoc
I've said it many times: you can fix code, you can't fix people.
added on the 2018-07-26 10:13:40 by Gargaj Gargaj
so don't send them invitations?
added on the 2018-07-26 10:53:05 by havoc havoc
400x300 is not a native resolution either though, so the invitation is already there.
added on the 2018-07-26 10:57:24 by Gargaj Gargaj
it's just about close enough to lowres PAL overscan for that invitation not to sound too loudly according to the last 18 years
added on the 2018-07-26 11:11:51 by havoc havoc
Quote:
400x300 is not a native resolution either though, so the invitation is already there.


Perhaps 800x600 was too much, so they halved the dimensions.
added on the 2018-07-26 11:36:22 by Foebane72 Foebane72
So upscaling them in realtime is not a thing in modern times?
added on the 2018-07-26 20:18:39 by Zplex Zplex

login