pouët.net

Freax vol. 1. - Feedback

category: residue [glöplog]
Yeah, Amsterdam is the capital of bicycle theft, but it's not likely for me to arrive there anytime soon. Also, my apologies if you never received your Art Album copy, but just throw me your address to tomcat@tomcatpolo.hu and I'll send you one. I recall having a few extra copies.
added on the 2013-05-27 20:05:03 by tomcat tomcat
i think there's a difference between a citizen and the same citizen again and again. you're not exactly a victim when getting black listed for repeatedly being "annoying". also, it would happen in bar/football stadium/shoe shop/demoparty/where ever, now the people working there aren't all nazi/communists, they just want to keep their place in order. same goes for people trying to run things in your country.
I didn't know there is a limit for expressing your opinion. Can I do it how many times a year? Or is there a lifetime limit, like for radiation? So you agree that it's all right to "blacklist" people for using their basic rights too often? It's OK to put them in jail and frame them as terrorists if they exceeded their quotas? Man, you're fucked up.
added on the 2013-05-27 20:17:02 by tomcat tomcat
It is a basic right to dump a shitload of eggs on some parading gays?
Why don't you just go and suck some cocks, bitch?!
added on the 2013-05-27 20:23:57 by SiR SiR
like i already said, there's a limit for certain ways of expressing your opinion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL-J7gBj9sk&t=0m35s

Yes, you deserve a place in jail.
added on the 2013-05-27 20:26:11 by Rob Rob
Sir: Because I am not your mother.

CrossProduct: The guy I punched there is the vice-president of Jobbik. Still certain about that jail? Also, are you a pussy?
added on the 2013-05-27 20:31:33 by tomcat tomcat
Maali: Limits are outlined in laws, and I never crossed any of them. Your personal opinion will not decide in this matter.
added on the 2013-05-27 20:33:33 by tomcat tomcat
Last time I checked I did not look like a cat, so I would have to say no.
added on the 2013-05-27 20:37:31 by Rob Rob
Then why are you whining out about a man punching another? This was a personal matter, and it's not up to you to judge about it. Have you never seen a brawl?
added on the 2013-05-27 20:39:18 by tomcat tomcat
Quote:
The guy I punched there is the vice-president of Jobbik

Quote:
Limits are outlined in laws, and I never crossed any of them

abbondon thread
added on the 2013-05-27 20:39:51 by vectory vectory
I see, yet another functional illiterate has arrived. We were talking about legal limits of free speech, and I referred to them. Hitting that dick has nothing to do with free speech. By the way, aren't you kids a little hypocritic?
added on the 2013-05-27 20:46:06 by tomcat tomcat
Why? Do you have a video of us hitting people straight in the face?
added on the 2013-05-27 20:51:14 by Rob Rob
IMO being homophobic is childish. Punching people in the face is childish.
added on the 2013-05-27 20:52:37 by Rob Rob
Exactly. If you're gonna punch something, punch a koala!
added on the 2013-05-27 20:59:10 by superplek superplek
Let me decide who I punch and why, OK? That bastard launched a libel campaign against me, tried to defame me with anonymous accusations, and spoil my honor. He can be grateful that I did not fuck him in front of everybody. The video was made by a cameraman, who happened to be there, as this happened at a courthouse. FYI I also won the lawsuit against the bastard.

Also FYI: homosexuality is not equal to the gay political movement. Homosexuality is an unfortunate aberration, it's like being colorblind or left-handed, there's no point hating people for that. Organizing events to promote homosexuality and boast about it like it were something of an achievement is wrong. I don't want gays rubbing their dicks in my face claiming they are sooo fabulous. I don't want straight people doing that either. Only very stupid people think that not accepting these gay pride things equals hating gays just because they are gay.
added on the 2013-05-27 21:02:47 by tomcat tomcat
The people are NOT promoting homosexuality.

They are promoting equal rights.

And also, it is not an unfortunate aberration. Who are you to decide that?
added on the 2013-05-27 21:05:04 by Rob Rob
How can one even promote something that is like being left-handed or being colorblind?!

You contradict yourself.
added on the 2013-05-27 21:06:06 by Rob Rob
Quote:
IMO being homophobic is childish.

Naw... It's more an indicator of psychological repression.
And I should not call you a liberalist, right?

Equal rights for what? I've never seen a single legal provision in my country that contains specific details about how gays are exempt from any right. You're a pretty stupid person if you think that all this "rights" game is actually about rights. They have a political agenda. Do we really want to start a political debate on pouet.net?

Homosexuality is an aberration, by definition. I have nothing better right now that Wikipedia, which defines this word as: "An aberration is something that deviates from the normal way." That is it. Homosexuals are sexually aberrated people who have sexual desires towards their own sexes - now, this is a definition, do not argue with it. The biological purpose of sex is reproduction, in case your momma never told this. Gays can not reproduce, or even if they physically could, they don't have the desire. This is a setback, a handicap, therefore unfortunate. Enough of trivialites, Mr. Gay Rights Advocate, or should we go deeper? (Pun intended.)
added on the 2013-05-27 21:11:27 by tomcat tomcat
Quote:
He can be grateful that I did not fuck him in front of everybody.

Oops! Freudian slip!
thom, so you're just one step from sending people who think differently to you, to mental institutes. Congratulations, shake hands with Beriya. (Do you even know who was him?)
added on the 2013-05-27 21:12:38 by tomcat tomcat
CONGRATULATIONS, thom, you've pointed out the pun! Hope it didn't boil your brains.
added on the 2013-05-27 21:13:30 by tomcat tomcat
Quote:
I've never seen a single legal provision in my country that contains specific details about how gays are exempt from any right.


From wikipedia:

Quote:
In Autumn 2007, the liberal Alliance of Free Democrats (SZDSZ), part of the governing coalition since the 2002 elections, presented a draft bill to the Parliament's Human Rights committee. This would have allowed for full same-sex marriage by defining marriage as between two persons over the age of 18.[6] On 6 November 2007, Parliament's human rights committee rejected the bill without debate. Opponents of the bill pointed to a Constitutional Court ruling a few months earlier that defined the institution of marriage as a bond between a man and a woman.[7]

On January 1, 2012, a new constitution enacted by the government of Viktor Orbán, leader of the ruling Fidesz party, came into effect, restricting marriage to opposite-sex couples and containing no guarantees of protection from discrimination on account of sexual orientation
added on the 2013-05-27 21:16:00 by Rob Rob
Anway, talking with you is depressing.

Greetings from Amsterdam!

BB Image
added on the 2013-05-27 21:17:26 by Rob Rob

login