pouët.net

uncle-x information 1624 glöps

• general:
• level: user
• personal:
• first name: N.
• last name: L.
• cdcs:
• cdc #1: Saint by Halcyon & Da Jormas [web]
• cdc #2: x14 by orange
• cdc #3: fr-055: 828 by Farbrausch [web]
• cdc #4: The Legend of Sisyphus by Andromeda Software Development [web]
• cdc #5: Zeroed by Satori [web]

• demo Commodore 64 Eye 2
• Thumbs up for doing stuff and learning instead of resorting to slop machines.
• rulezadded on the 2026-11-03 16:03:05
• demo Commodore 64 Slits by Extend
• From the production notes on csdb:
  
  
  Quote:

  "AI was heavily used in the production, for tooling, build system, converters and slightly for code optimisation and bug hunting.
  
  AI was not used for producing effetcs, ideas, concepts, graphics, music, design, timing or syncing.
  
  We chose our path, you can choose yours."

• isokadded on the 2026-11-02 23:30:02
• demo Commodore 64 SIM LOHJA 1989 by Oy Lohja AI [web]
• Slop :(
• sucksadded on the 2026-11-01 12:52:26
• demo Amiga AGA BELIEVE by cr!sp [web]
• Slop :(
• sucksadded on the 2026-11-01 12:51:14
• 64k JavaScript Your turn by Anksai Collective [web]
• What v3nom said.
  
  It’s sad to see grown-ass men get so offended on behalf of LLMs that they need to resort to taking a shit on the floor and scream ”u can’t stop me ha ha ha i am very intelligent!”
  
  So. Fuckin. Sad. And pathetic. Utter loser behavior.
• sucksadded on the 2026-11-01 12:45:19
• demo PICO-8 Stella's Adventure
• Forgotten thumb. A nice little story-prod.
• rulezadded on the 2026-10-31 11:03:44
• 4k Windows Mandelbrötchen 004 by Mandelbrötchen & Rebels
• I liked the music here.
• rulezadded on the 2026-10-31 11:01:19
• demo Amstrad CPC Before the flood by Logon System
• Thanks for being honest about AI usage in the infofile. This should be the way.
• isokadded on the 2026-10-30 22:00:29
• diskmag JavaScript DOS Corner #01 by 7dUMP & SandS [web]
• I’m gonna do this in good faith with you this one time:
  
  
  Quote:

  Just so I can understand your line of thinking: if I publish a review of some demos in the diskmag, including screenshots, and some of those screenshots happen to contain AI-generated content, am I obligated to label the magazine as containing genAI?

  
  
  You misunderstand. That genAI content you’re reviewing is not content you claimed to make, so why would anyone blame you for it?
  
  But… why would you spend time reviewing something someone else did not make?
  
  
  Quote:

  As for whether you personally trust me or not, I don’t give a fuck.

  
  
  It’s not just me. I’m pretty sure many sceners who dislike genAI and especially undisclosed genAI usage in demoscene productions now feel the same. Especially considering how evasive you’ve been here. Again a problem that exists only because you decided not to disclose your own genAI usage from the start.
  
  
  Quote:

  Have you written even a single review of any of my demos? Clearly, you’re not interested in them.

  
  
  Or maybe i just haven’t seen them, or if i have, i have just not commented on them? I don’t comment on all demos i see, and most of the time i only comment on some of the ones that i personally experienced at a demoparty and which left an impression on me.
  
  
  Quote:

  So why should I care about your opinion? You’re only interested in one thing: giving a thumb down for using AI without following some supposed disclosure rules that exist nowhere but in your own head.

  
  
  JSYK: A few years back i decided to thumb down only demos that a) feature genAI (especially if it is undisclosed) and/or b) demos that promote/support fascism.
  
  If you’re wondering why you see thumbs down from me in various prods, those are the reasons. I’m guessing many with similar thumb behavior have similar reasons.
  
  Lastly: please read what i wrote in the ai thread on the bbs to get an understanding why many of us dislike and oppose genAI.
• isokadded on the 2026-10-29 21:57:07
• diskmag JavaScript DOS Corner #01 by 7dUMP & SandS [web]
• Quote:

  Take it as: I’m not going to explain or justify myself to you. The articles in this release clearly explain where the images in Remoded came from. But that wouldn’t put your doubts to rest anyway, would it?

  
  
  Thing is: you didn’t disclose AI use here until pressed on the matter, so how can we trust you in the future? This erosion of trust is one of the key issues with genAI in any creative field.
  
  This could have been avoided by disclosing the usage in the infofile for example. Maybe in the future you can do that if you still release somethibg that has genAI content.
• isokadded on the 2026-10-29 20:00:20