pouët.net

remorse ascii artpack 55 by ANSI Creators in Demand [web]
[nfo]
screenshot added by radman1 on 2004-09-27 04:06:39
platform :
type :
release date : september 2004
  • rulez 9
  • is ok 7
  • sucks 0
popularity : 56%
 56%
  • rulez 0.56
alltime top: #10038
added on the 2004-09-24 19:08:33 by radman1 radman1

popularity helper

increase the popularity of this prod by spreading this URL:

or via: facebook twitter pinterest tumblr

comments

Straight outta Compton
added on the 2004-09-24 19:08:54 by radman1 radman1
radman learn reading while submitting please! where is the GUI?

please delete.
added on the 2004-09-24 19:14:21 by dipswitch dipswitch
I was under the impression that the "artpacks" section on Pouet was for... artpacks?

Please correct me if I'm wrong!
added on the 2004-09-24 19:24:41 by radman1 radman1
okay let me quote from http://www.pouet.net/submitprod.php :

Quote:


if it's an artpack or musicdisk without GUI/viewer, DON'T ADD IT


clear enough?
added on the 2004-09-24 19:33:28 by dipswitch dipswitch
Fair enough, if Spinsane forgot to include the RemorseViewer I will kick his ass.

...and fix the pack tonight.
rulez added on the 2004-09-24 19:35:02 by radman1 radman1
I think I now understand why radman still dont get why people grew tired of his spamming...

http://www.pouet.net/submitprod.php :
"if it's an artpack or musicdisk without GUI/viewer, DON'T ADD IT"

which word didnt you understand? maybe we can explain it.
added on the 2004-09-24 19:35:26 by keops keops
ah, dip posted at the same time :)
added on the 2004-09-24 19:36:00 by keops keops
Hi Keops,

This is not spam. There have been several other artpacks uploaded in this past week without a viewer.

We have a viewer for Remorse and if it was forgotten, I will see to it that it be added this evening.

kthx.
added on the 2004-09-24 19:42:42 by radman1 radman1
Hi Lamers!

Please let me know which one of these are coded!

http://www.pouet.net/prodlist.php?page=1&type=artpack&order=added

Wow, look at all these SPAMMERS.
added on the 2004-09-24 19:46:41 by radman1 radman1
are you dumb or what?

the spam anecdote was only there to emphasize the fact that you definitely dont understand how things work (pilgrimage spam with redundant threads, submission policy for prods etc...)
added on the 2004-09-24 19:51:48 by keops keops
Yup, me and 100% of the other uploaders just don't get it.

Keops, you are so cool.
added on the 2004-09-24 19:55:19 by radman1 radman1
In case you 2 are missing the point, artpacks by their very definition are generally not self-contained coded productions.

Very few artpack-releasing scene groups have their own internalized viewers. Remorse DOES have a viewer and it should have been included.

Comprendevouz?
added on the 2004-09-24 19:58:12 by radman1 radman1
maali now thats even more lame. fuck you, dutch kiddie. no matter what, you cant diss persons in that way.
added on the 2004-09-24 19:58:20 by dipswitch dipswitch
REMORSE RULES U!
rulez added on the 2004-09-24 19:59:15 by uns3en_ uns3en_
We liked it so much we put that image in RMRS-55. Thanks for the guest release Maali.

:-)
added on the 2004-09-24 19:59:29 by radman1 radman1
ditswitch: radman spammed some barfbag-design competition a few months ago, that was my entry :P
Thats right kids, everything I do and say is SPAM. I'm not trying to crack jokes about the hillarity of a barfbag compo, or add legitimate artpacks to a category which by its very definition is not a coded production.

It's all SPAM.

All the time.

RAD SPAM 24 7.
added on the 2004-09-24 20:03:11 by radman1 radman1
radman: i just noticed... kewl ;)
If a Remorse artpack can't be added to pouet, then the artpack category should be removed. Nothing in this category is coded.

End of story.
added on the 2004-09-24 20:04:19 by radman1 radman1
If a Remorse artpack can't be added to pouet, then the artpack category should be removed. Nothing in this category is coded.

Indeed. The demoscene form of an artpack is called slideshow. If the artpack comes with a gui and music, it's practically the same though.
added on the 2004-09-24 20:20:23 by tomaes tomaes
and me thinking no one would really care much about the artpack category and i wouldnt have to delete the couple dozen prods without gui that were submitted before the idea of such a category even sufaced..

cant we all just get along?
added on the 2004-09-24 20:36:03 by psenough psenough
you're late, ps :)

<reed> can't we all just get high, get along and be best friends?
<reed> and turn on, tune in, drop out? :)

(yes, the actual conversation was related to this thread)
added on the 2004-09-24 20:50:30 by reed reed
wooptydoo
nice pack :)
but uh
shut up
you are all a bunch of whiny bastards. boo hoo hoo.
rulez added on the 2004-09-24 21:27:01 by haliphax haliphax
There was couple of really nice ascii-pictures.
rulez added on the 2004-09-26 10:44:13 by blueflame blueflame
all of it roxXx
|\| i C E !
rulez added on the 2004-09-27 04:16:33 by iks iks
_ .
/-| (_ | | )
rulez added on the 2004-09-27 21:21:33 by dbrn dbrn
|\| i C 3
rulez added on the 2004-12-28 21:50:02 by erpherman erpherman
rulez.
rulez added on the 2005-04-17 12:16:48 by las las
OK.
added on the 2017-07-04 02:59:00 by sim sim

submit changes

if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,

do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.

instead, click here !

[previous edits]

add a comment