pouët.net

to the pain editors

category: general [glöplog]
 
is it not possible to make a top 10 even if the voters only have to vote for their top3 in each category? i think 8 is a bit much to be honest, it is a lot of names to remember. I would like to vote for my top3 in each category, but 8 is too much because to be fair i have to go back and view a couple of the productions over etc.. but i always remember my current top 3 by heart

cheers


added on the 2007-11-29 00:10:31 by NoahR NoahR
Afair, you don't have to fill the 10 slots.
added on the 2007-11-29 00:12:35 by keops keops
ah, ok i just thought i had to because they where there. did i miss some explaning text on the page?
added on the 2007-11-29 00:17:12 by NoahR NoahR
nope, I only remember that from somebody who once asked about it and that's the answer that was given to him back then :)
added on the 2007-11-29 00:20:56 by keops keops
rightio, cheers Keops :)
added on the 2007-11-29 00:21:23 by NoahR NoahR
good point though, it could use some clarification.. i never really manage to complete all the slots without resorting to real bad namevoting.
added on the 2007-11-29 00:39:56 by skrebbel skrebbel
yes, you dont have to fill all the slots, your vote will still be counted despite properly adjusted.
added on the 2007-11-29 02:50:46 by psenough psenough
adjusted how? shifted down or up? i need to add jumalauta to some bottom slots, if down!
added on the 2007-11-29 11:49:01 by skrebbel skrebbel
when you fill in the 10 slots you get 10 points for number 1, 9 points for number 2, etc. when you fill in only 3 slots you get 3 points for number 1, 2 points for number 2, etc.
so, if you cant recall any other good enough sceners/prods to fill in the rest, the ones you named count less comparing to other voters.
added on the 2007-11-29 11:59:01 by psenough psenough
jumalauta will win the pain charts.
added on the 2007-11-29 12:09:34 by skrebbel skrebbel
Quote:
so, if you cant recall any other good enough sceners/prods to fill in the rest, the ones you named count less comparing to other voters.

eh? strange system...
added on the 2007-11-29 13:54:09 by prm prm
how on earth did i make iit 8 ...damn my short term memory is shitzored :( well atleast i can remember my own name and my top 3
added on the 2007-11-29 14:37:38 by NoahR NoahR
Iblis: I usually enter "Skrebbels" in the blanks I did not manage to fill in ;)
added on the 2007-11-29 15:31:48 by keops keops
Quote:
when you fill in the 10 slots you get 10 points for number 1, 9 points for number 2, etc. when you fill in only 3 slots you get 3 points for number 1, 2 points for number 2, etc.
so, if you cant recall any other good enough sceners/prods to fill in the rest, the ones you named count less comparing to other voters.


hmm...that doesnt seem fair.
So if I vote:
1.Chaos 2.Smash

And Mr.X votes:
1.Kalms 2.Pantaloon 3.UncleX 4.CurlyB 5.Blueberry 6.Navis 7.Chaos 8.Smash

Chaos and Smash would only get 4 and 2 points from me and Mr.X alltogheter? But CurlyB would have 5 points, even though Mr.X thinks he is "only" the 4th best coder....

If that is your system, you should definitely reduce the number of slots, or have the pulldown things that Eurochart has.

Doesnt seem fair to me.
added on the 2007-11-29 16:34:18 by tFt tFt
lol@keops. i bet you do :p
added on the 2007-11-29 17:30:37 by NoahR NoahR
I'm not going to vote anyway, but still, I totally agree with tFt. It just doesn't seem fair towards anyone.
added on the 2007-12-12 09:45:04 by DiamonDie DiamonDie
iblis, he actually does.
added on the 2007-12-12 10:44:18 by skrebbel skrebbel
some time ago, we have set out calls on what voting style system the scene wishes. we set out calls on suggestions on the algorithms and so on.. feedback was close to none - as expected.

tFt: you're right with your complaint. however, this system was introduced because of all the idiots having fake scene-id accounts voting 10 times with different logins for 1. "someone" 2. "somebody". would give 10 x 10 points for "someone" and 10 x 9 points for "sombody" - which doesn't look much more fair either.

currently, it's our aim to adjust and simplify the voting system again for the next issue (not the one we're working on now). less categories, less trouble and a point-count-influence-o-meter depending on how many lines are filled and what not. suggestions and ideas are still highly appreciated since i'm far from being a math/stats/distribution specialist and i'm not familiar with commonly used fair-to-the-max vote counting algorithms :)
added on the 2007-12-12 14:08:27 by unlock unlock
I think that voting for 10 places is simply too much. Five would be a lot better and that way your current scoring system would be quite a bit more fair than it is now, IMO.
added on the 2007-12-22 14:21:34 by DiamonDie DiamonDie

login