pouët.net

fix me beautifull

category: general [glöplog]
300th post(well,301th actually) ;)
added on the 2004-06-14 16:13:12 by lodda lodda
i could also fix that ;)
added on the 2004-06-14 16:16:06 by psenough psenough
Oops i did a mistake
can you change the group of this prod : http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=12502
and assign it to this group please
http://www.pouet.net/groups.php?which=3555
thanx and sorry
you suck please die fixed
added on the 2004-06-14 19:12:43 by psenough psenough
please delete prod 12512 - 12514 since they are dupes...(sorry!)

greetings, giZMo
added on the 2004-06-16 10:36:36 by giZMo^fr giZMo^fr
i think this was why the name check limitation was so usefull... i need to reimplment something in that submitprod.php to prevent ppl from reentering stuff.. its same "feature" like the comments double posting...
i guess i'll do some sort of done=1 when submitting and just check if it is set on the url before adding.. should work.. need time to implement.. next weekend..
added on the 2004-06-16 18:06:05 by psenough psenough
better idea:
"a prod with this name already exists. are you sure? [yes]/[no]"
added on the 2004-06-16 18:11:45 by Gargaj Gargaj
would you change the download to http://www.scene.org/file.php?file=%2Fparties%2F2002%2Fcompusphere02%2Fdemo%2Fslt-virus%28pre-final%29.zip&fileinfo (or however you want to link to scene.org-files) for http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=8372 please? =)
added on the 2004-06-17 14:36:04 by fox fox
ok, pouet fucked that up a bit.. this prod: http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=8372
should have
[url]http://www.scene.org/file.php?file=%2Fparties%2F2002%2Fcompusphere02%2Fdemo%2Fslt-virus%28pre-final%29.zip&fileinfo[url]
this download.. let's try that then =)
added on the 2004-06-17 14:38:00 by fox fox
ps: strange thing in the "excess" prod-listing;

solskogen 2004 invitation - Linux,Windows -f####d at Solskogen - June 2004

the "f####d" is supposed to be "99th" i believe. :)
added on the 2004-06-17 17:57:50 by gloom gloom
gloom: yep, ppl put 99 when it usually was disqualified or was made for the party but didnt compete.. == was fucked on delivery to that party.

no position defined == ??
wasnt expecting you to put a 99 on an invtro :)
i'll erase the 99 there ;)
added on the 2004-06-17 21:12:19 by psenough psenough
fixed.

fox: ofcourse you do realize that if you do a final final in less then 2 weeks and ask me to change the url again im gonna insult you, right?
added on the 2004-06-17 22:25:58 by psenough psenough
take a deep breath ps :)
added on the 2004-06-17 22:43:45 by keops keops
ps: hehe, well, the reason i did was just to put it in under the "solskogen banner". if i didn't enter a place, someone lame would have entered 1st place or something like that, so the "safe bet" was to select the lowest place possible. i've seen this practice with other people also.

maybe a "invitation to this party"-option should be made possible.

btw; how are we doing on the idea of changing the ranking-system with more specialised rankings? (say, three categories - music, gfx, code, or something like that..)
added on the 2004-06-17 23:57:41 by gloom gloom
ps: there will probably never be a entirely "final" version =D

we're perfectionists. so this is it, even though it wasn't really a final version ;)
added on the 2004-06-18 01:52:02 by fox fox
gloom: hmm i could assign party_place = 98 to show as "invitation for partyxxx" on the groups.php?which=xx ... sounds good doesnt it? i'll do it tomorow. (got exam in 8 hours, need some sleep and last minute studying to do it now..)

there was an idea for changing ranking system for more specialized rankings? i dont remember anyone asking _me_ to implement that.. and frankly dont really see it as a usefull distinction right now... it could be usefull in the long run if you would make distinctions in those categories in popularity searches and stuff, but frankly, i wouldnt bother.. :D further more, if we have code+gfx+music then someone will ask for originality and design and oldskool flavour and what not other things you can think of.. i say lets keep it down to earth. if you want to scrutinize your opinion on the demo use the text field on your comment. the thumbs are just extras to help show the general first impression that demo made on that particular viewer really...

fox: why release a pre-final (and bother to ask ppl to replace links) when you're still working on a final final? ok, you're swedish, but still.. just make sure your final version works awesomly on my p3 1ghz gf2mx and i might possibly not insult you when you ask me to change the url to the final version ;)
added on the 2004-06-18 02:14:13 by psenough psenough
fox: oh, i missread your post =) ok then :)
added on the 2004-06-18 02:15:24 by psenough psenough
bent: i couldnt sleep and was tired of studying so i did the 98 = invite for patch. tested and moved to www.pouet.net already. fixed it on prod.php and added extra info about it on submitpartyinfo.php aswell..
added on the 2004-06-18 02:53:31 by psenough psenough
filipe: you're a regular scene-hero you are. :)

now - to get people to use it..
added on the 2004-06-18 07:12:31 by gloom gloom
www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=318
plattform is windows
release date is 8/99
party is evoke 99
added on the 2004-06-18 12:16:00 by pandur pandur
fixed
added on the 2004-06-18 14:44:44 by psenough psenough
Amazing that this oldskool pouët.net bbs, Has made it to 323, Keep on Going ---->
added on the 2004-06-19 08:19:58 by Mike 3D Mike 3D
Faked group release :
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=9001
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=8930
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=8931
True group seems to be : http://pouet.net/groups.php?which=1194
(listed on their webpage http://www33.brinkster.com/fearmoths/who.htm )

group :
http://pouet.net/groups.php?which=2342
have it's website here :
http://www33.brinkster.com/fearmoths

login