pouët.net

Wikipedia Genocide

category: general [glöplog]
life is unfair even.. brah..
added on the 2004-11-15 12:06:35 by okkie okkie
funfair
Strange, had to log in 3 times. :)

...And I expected some JPEGs of cute, cuddly kittens by now.
added on the 2004-11-15 22:49:50 by radman1 radman1
BB Image
meow.
added on the 2004-11-15 23:48:04 by Gargaj Gargaj
Looks like "RaD Man" survives round 2. :)


In other news, I plan to take a snapshot of all "scene-related" articles on Wikipedia on the last day of 2004. It will be interesting to see how these transform and what is new come December 2005. :-)

added on the 2004-11-17 02:00:11 by radman1 radman1
BB Image

Mind the seal!
added on the 2004-11-17 04:19:40 by Stelthzje Stelthzje
seals are sooooo last week.. the new fad is fat women!

BB Image
added on the 2004-11-17 10:47:44 by okkie okkie
Holy shit, okkie. that's just ugly :D
Is that guy just being crushed to death?
added on the 2004-11-17 13:00:23 by Stelthzje Stelthzje
i like the painting
added on the 2004-11-17 13:22:24 by okkie okkie
oh man
added on the 2004-11-17 19:27:19 by jeenio jeenio
http://www.nadine-online.be/film/dollekoe.mpeg likewise videofootage of Okkie's post! a must-see! :)
she moves nice
added on the 2004-11-18 00:35:43 by jeenio jeenio
way too much free time syndrome
added on the 2004-11-18 01:15:07 by psenough psenough
VfD:Wikipedia and VfD:http://wikipedia.org

I'm sure we can do it! To achieve this outstanding goal, we'll only have to follow a few simple rules:

- make sure you use a lot of acronyms and "buzzwords" to show that you know what you're talking about. primary candidate of choice is "Vanity", "nonPOV" and "semi-policy" coming right behind (and no real wikipedian will want to argue against semi-policy)
- claim users who oppose our vote to be sockpuppets, because - as we learn from wikipedia itself - sockpuppets are bad. important: do it *before* they allege the same of you; be careful, though: only users with few post are suitable for the "sockpuppet" label (it's a wikipedia semi-policy). you can safely call others myopic, though.
- post this VfD suggestion on the 1st of april. that way it'll look like a prank, and probably even some of the more serious users will vote for deletion simple for the sake of humor. afterwards, after achieving a 2/3rd majority, claim it to be a valid poll and insist on enforcement. soothe the minds via suggestion of review/undeletion after a small "cooldown time". if people complain and demand an instantaneous review, refer to "abuse of VfD" (semi-)policy and demand censorship of those who claim.


after all this said and done, lean back and look at this picture:
http://www.austinpowers.com/objects/images/evilpinky.jpg
added on the 2004-11-18 04:05:13 by ChaosCom ChaosCom
ChaosCom,

I think someone has beat us to the punch. Deleting history on Wikipedia is now a recognized "extreme sport". :-)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Extreme_article_deletion

This is the funniest thing I've seen yet.
added on the 2004-11-18 16:21:21 by radman1 radman1
RaD Man: EAD is only an aprils fool. ;)
Heh.

Wikipedia has now been Pouetized:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_extreme_deletion/Textfiles.com/Votes_for_extreme_deletion/Textfiles.com
added on the 2004-11-19 04:48:51 by radman1 radman1
Okkie im going to kill you for that! -_-
added on the 2004-11-19 16:43:57 by NoahR NoahR
the fact that wikipedia doens't have a self-referential link under 'useless' says it all for me.
Paniq's in a panic!
I gave up on the site long ago. Nowadays, if I ever want to "contribute" something to Wikipedia, I preemtively immediately vote to have it deleted mid-way through so I don't waste my time.
added on the 2005-02-07 20:08:57 by radman1 radman1

login