fix me beautifull
category: general [glöplog]
This prod exists in hardcode.zip (HardCode/65536/windows/introkeygen template #2/Keygen_SnD_Golden.exe), I believe.
This prod exists in hardcode.zip (HardCode/65536/windows/c64 forever cracktro/-TiNYiSO.exe). It seems to run and produces something that looks very much like the screenshot, at least.
This prod seems to exist in hardcode.zip (HardCode/08192/flash/a bubble for your thoughts/), though I don't have Flash anymore, so I can't verify.
This prod seems to exist within this file; the story is a bit unclear to me, but it seems that iso_ka01, ka02, etc. are all some versions of a demomaker, where ISO_TUNG.ZIP (the same file in all of them, I think?) is some sort of example. So the inner .zip should probably just be lifted out and then it's back on its feet.
tried to add @party 2026 to its actual page but it made a new one instead FUCK https://www.pouet.net/party.php?which=2156
@sesse: done
@lfo: you can't add a year. it will be generated when you add a prod for it (and select the year when entering the prod information) i deleted your addition.
@lfo: you can't add a year. it will be generated when you add a prod for it (and select the year when entering the prod information) i deleted your addition.
this prod exists in hardcode.zip (HardCode/32768/windows/cracktro no. 1/).
this prod also exists in hardcode.zip, I believe (HardCode/65536/windows/lego star wars the complete saga plus1 trainer/).
And this prod exists in hardcode.zip (HardCode/04096/windows/3kb colorbars).
(Let me know when you are tired of these :-) )
this prod also exists in hardcode.zip, I believe (HardCode/65536/windows/lego star wars the complete saga plus1 trainer/).
And this prod exists in hardcode.zip (HardCode/04096/windows/3kb colorbars).
(Let me know when you are tired of these :-) )
One more: this prod exists in hardcode.zip, under HardCode/00256/dos/tiniest dpmi.
There is a problem with this prod: ...
it's a port of StarPath
and also an invitation to Outline 2026
(i don't know if links to Outline 2026 can already be set)
it's a port of StarPath
and also an invitation to Outline 2026
(i don't know if links to Outline 2026 can already be set)
I think, to be honest, this prod is mislabeled and that it should be 1900 and not 1901. There is already another 1901 invite (by a different group), this 1900 invite matches the screenshot exactly and the inner filename (MILL-INV.EXE) matches the URL (mill-inv.zip). I've not found any other 1900 invites, but there are 1902 and 1903 invites, I believe.
So either they reused exactly the same invite format two years in a row with not even a palette change, or it's got the wrong year and then this is the right zip file. It's obviously not impossible (lazier things have happened), but all things considered, I think it should be renamed to 1900 and changed into being an invite for the 2000 party.
So either they reused exactly the same invite format two years in a row with not even a palette change, or it's got the wrong year and then this is the right zip file. It's obviously not impossible (lazier things have happened), but all things considered, I think it should be renamed to 1900 and changed into being an invite for the 2000 party.
There is a problem with this prod: It 404s and the CSDB release points nowhere (I guess that when they make a correction, the old one just goes away). Searching a bit on csdb, I think it is either this release or this release (the latter calls the former “the original”), and neither is a demo, just a plain graphics with no music?
The comments also seem to indicate that the download used to be some sort of demopack… So perhaps it should just be deleted. Someone will lose their poor glöp for thumbing it up, though.
The comments also seem to indicate that the download used to be some sort of demopack… So perhaps it should just be deleted. Someone will lose their poor glöp for thumbing it up, though.
There is a problem with this prod (Game Mix 2): CSDB has deleted it and its files. I found another file online claiming to be “Game Mix 2”, but it's a hash match against “game mix 4 [tsm]”, so I think it's just spurious and 2 never existed.
done up to the the c64 stuff.
@sesse: i left the 1901. it would be a weird coincidence if the date (put into the pouet db) + invi for party + name are 2001 instead of 2000. sure it might be but without a file one might never know. however the link you provided is for the 2000 edition which was missing.
@sesse: i left the 1901. it would be a weird coincidence if the date (put into the pouet db) + invi for party + name are 2001 instead of 2000. sure it might be but without a file one might never know. however the link you provided is for the 2000 edition which was missing.
Yeah, it's truly impossible to know without the file. The only problem is that if it's true, it's also unfalsifiable :-)